Objective Reality, History and Subjective Conceit

I write here to the riddle of seemingly conflicting 'pasts' that do not easily fit a narrative or linear construct without denying experience to a present assertion - or using a selected or invented past to justify a current sense of self-experience.

From behind the scene, the belief in a single linear exclusive and objective 'reality is PART of and predicate TO such reality idea - because the term 'reality' is awareness or experience of.
You can imagine a tree falling in a forest that no one sees - but you must 'see' or behold that in imagination to consider it. At energetic levels that we call physics - communication is a state of relation of no truly separate parts and so a disequilibrium in motion is from any moving point of focus and balance within a totality. Now you may become aware of your nostrils as you breath - but this were not absent totality in the moment before, when the point of focus was given elsewhere.
But I can thus only draw attention to what you are able to recognise and bring to awareness through a shared language and underlying human experience of very very fast but shifting attention among a total information field. The totality is not 'fast' but instantaneous or synchronous - taking no time at all. The ability to 'assemble' an unfolding focus of explorative experience within totality is of course an expression OF the creation of experience.

In this sense the creature is the point of its creative matrix or total environment - that we can represent as a many levelled and many faceted expression of totality that 'fits' or is in relation to all other parts. This is the 'holographic' idea of the one in the all and the all or many in the one.

But the creative function operating through or within itself is without time or space - always already now - and insofar as a point of view or idea-perspective is sustained, it is a total creation in which all points or parts align, to generate the experience of object persistence - and changes of state of objects, in relationship to our view and to each other, which necessarily records as part of recognition and so memory of past states can hold expression and experience of the unfolding of idea as experience in-formation. The primary nature of which is resonance to its original expression of idea-extension.

The exploration of idea as freedom or creative rather than a mechanically closed system, is the giving and receiving of life - as resonant recognition of 'SELF' and through all and any forms of subsidiary or derivative identifications. Life can never be inside or outside a form, image or structure of identification but can be be-lived as if the ideal or idol is a reality unto itself and thus overlaid upon or given focus over the living.

Such a 'consciousness' as can seem to reverse cause and effect is our human conditioning. While the nature of the conditioning is a sense of splitting from our being as a 'separation trauma' - the development of such consciousness - and its world or experience - is part of and within a truly sustaining idea in the mind of one in all - but as if at odds with and in hiding from the reliving of trauma and the underlying conflict of identity that the sense of separation took form as or is associated with.

Persisting a misidentification effectively shuffles the pack so as not to know who we are of. A mind and world arise to cover a nakedness of self-lack - resulting from a sense of self-definition in limitation and loss and protecting such identity by aligning all things to support it.

The use of the past to assert separate or special self interest over all else is a collective distortion that periodically demands resetting as a result of unworkability or unsustainability. We can learn to recognise this as discarded or unconscious reality to a self that assigns consciousness to a state of such limitation and lack of awareness as to be largely running as subconscious routine to the underlying survival dictates of a mind set in conflict.

Re-aligning in the true of who we are shall include an embracing of who we have been - as part of a freely accepted currency of resonance, recognition and exchange or 'life'. This is both an individual and a collective because the indivisibility of a true expression is in truth collectively shared in. But insofar as we recognise and accept life by extending or giving it, we are accepting responsibility for the balancing of our consciousness within an expanding field of awareness. Not least by the releasing of who or what we recognise we are NOT. Trying to become or persist in what we are not, demands sacrifice of the true in with-ness and worth.

To all things there is a timing and a fittingness to an order that truly sustains all that truly belongs. We may experience this as being in the flow of synchronicity in any kind of endeavour, of alignment in inspired purpose, but also... in the recognition of the errors that call for correcting within life - instead of under judgement set upon life, by which we cast ourself out.

I didn't get very close to the interesting contents of Gunnar Heinsohn's views and others.
But when the narrative 'reality' disintegrates - we effectively revisit its substratum of archetypal broken communications that include the mind's ability to 'shuffle the pack' or re-obscure the persistence of a command and control narrative in a shifted mythic representation. The intensity of the emotional charge that we call fear, hate, guilt - and all its derivatives cannot be overestimated in its power to deceive - and yet it has all the power we give it under such identifications given and received as one. Garbage in; garbage out - or as you give so shall you receive.
Only a split mind can shift from victimiser to victim and back again in ever shifting 'compartments' of frequency domain - so as to play out a script of 'victory' over or 'eviction' from wholeness.

My point is that our own response-ability for our alignment in idea and intent is a setting of frequency that dictates the formation of correspondences of resonance. The primary error that protects the error from correction is of aligning or identifying against the feared or hated 'evil' by projecting to get rid of, cast out or exclude. That is how we KEEP in experience what we love - by giving or extending presence. Using the mind as weapon is thus choosing to suffer the measure we give as if at the hand of another - as a shadow from a PAST that made us in anger.

The assertion that the past makes us, is stamped over a presence of discernment, such that our presence is denied and used or exploited to re-enact such a past - as if 'this time will be different'. But because it is blind and loveless in attempt to possess and control, it cannot see its own futility as a driven sense of lack, seeking in time and space for what it denies by active self-definition.

What then of conflicting 'realities'? They cannot be ultimate or absolute and so let them have brackets around them and perhaps probabilities or potentiality of service according to resonant truth of your own acceptance. 'You' also are therefore bracketed probabilities and potentials to align in as the expression of presence that shares - or masking presentation asserted. If you lose your balance you teach yourself a lesson for which you can then use to align. Or you can use the experience to teach yourself guilt, and generate a 'world' that supports your choice.

"What do I truly want", may therefore be the most fundamental question, because everything will be interpreted to support your chosen experience. But the quality of truth is self-revealing - and so asking a true question, waits on - and recognises true answer. Synchronicity of a shifted experience is recognised BECAUSE we made room for answer by asking.

Making more time in which to protect the mind-repeat of its past is a miscreative distortion of the ability to share in the qualities of the timeless - that are recognised 'Good' as resonant wholeness of life. The infinite is not absent any seeming finite expression.

Our World is innately psycho-physical and the quality of resonant attraction is not bound by time or space of distance. A plasma Universe is connected totality rather than lost in space. This has experiential recognition that is always already the case. Truth rises as the obvious when the false is released of investment as true.

The split mind is a realm of levels and principalities.The attempt to wield psychic power is the giving of power to the mind of imagery and symbolic substitution. Our perception of a world is of imagery that substitutes 'learned or acquired meanings' for a relational discernment of unified meaning.
At 'zero' or balance point there is no conflict. And yet through a seeming no thing - everything rises in an instant! - that includes you as integral - even down to a healed or corrected and inspired and connected perception.

Perceptions are never absolute but they can be innocent - and thus open to the shift from perceiving differentiations to knowing being. Undoing the mind-reversal doesn't deny us our world. It blesses our world. Forgetting what doesn't really matter, is remembering what does.

If it matters to you, why and what for? Self-honesty is the context for all true discovery. But finding ways to hide in false virtue works the cover story as 'discoverers'. That we are being lied to needs include our own thinking for our own reasons or motivations coming from a past we have largely masked over in a world of its unconscious re-enactment.