Seeking communication rather than agreement

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/founders-blog-drawing-dots-creating-our-own-pictures/

Seeking communication rather than agreement would pivot us back to honouring and acknowledging differences instead of persisting in a battle of judgements asserted as fact.

For my part the key dissociation from reality is where the mind is invoked to override the heart's recognition - which is always subject specific to a mental substitution of diversion and displacement. When fear conflicts the heart of the power of accepted decision, a mind of rules and conditions interjects as processes of solution that propagate the problem in new and seemingly unrelated forms - while establishing itself as the protective provider of security from deeper or now hidden fears.

That denied or evaded relational conflicts can be pushed onto others, onto outer conditions, and onto our body, is not so much a personal responsibility for outcome - but a breakdown of relational communication that results in a sense of personal fear, threat, disconnection and lack of support and direction - into which the mind as defence operates as an identity set in and by opposition, conflict or fear.

When any method of healing is identified hopeful by common agreement all kinds of ills are brought to it in hope of magical cure. By magical, I mean effecting a removal of the symptoms without addressing truly the subject specific cause or causes.  A false flag is wrongly addressed. To acknowledge what is - where it is may entail recognising and releasing false flagged attempt to re-assert control under a sense of fear of threat of pain of loss.

The mind is in a sense thus trained to marketise and weaponise (everything) for maintaining a sense of possession and control that in truth is the heart's decision of alignment and not a mind-set-in-its-own-spin seeking reinforcement as a default reaction to a block or recoil from communication and relation under fear that I often call 'separation trauma' - or indeed a fear of extinction that generates a rebellion against communication as an intensity of emotional force given to a mind-rule of evasion.

'Do something - pay later' is an inability to abide with and through our chaos of symptoms that seem to overwhelm our sense of self existence in Relation. The fight-flight mechanism elevated to command and control centre - to which a weak or broken heart must now appeal for protection - and sacrifice to in sympathy of support.

I am not suggesting we can seek psychic emotional or relational causes as if that in itself heals - because the mind loves to engage in processes of self-justifying and overriding interventions. But that a core component to healing - rather than symptom suppression in lieu of healing - is a true forgiveness of Self and self release.

Pausing from reactive thinking, calms to a clearer presence of free awareness in which fresh perspective and opportunity arises naturally or from the nature of our actual wholeness beneath the presentation of sickness and disease. This quality of a living discernment is denied by systemic assertions of intervention and coercion - even where there are helpful elements in the course of action.

I am told that on arriving at a scene of mass carnage paramedics have learned they must first become still or releasing of emotional reaction -perhaps for a period of minutes- so as to be able to truly discern who can be helped from who cannot and attend the need that can be met. The mind will frame the 'heart' as weak and emotional by rationalising hindsight set in judgements that undermine true insight and transformational learning. But the heart is the capacity to abide and embrace 'what is' to the point of recognising and aligning in love - which knows itself in the act of giving or sharing and is naked of pretensions and manipulations seeking sympathy and reinforcement for who we are.

The substratum or foundation from which we live is what is being undermined by a false-framed sense of power and protection. Self-responsibility is RELATIONAL responsibility as an individual extension of uncovered and shared worth. Its denial works the ruleset of an overriding collectivism given power by sacrifice of the heart's decision to a fear-defined SUBSTITUTION. But there is no substitution for love - but empty forms that suck out our wealth and life and joy by baiting us to sacrifice our self to their sustainability - as protecting 'even the little that we hath'.

Wholeness of being under compression must release what is dissonant and does not work or serve. This means 'clearing up our room' or sweeping the Temple of our devotions. 

But an identity invested in possession of control will contract from the field of relation into limitation by withdrawal and withholding so as to 'survive' in fear rather than become the seed of new life.

The 'political' underbelly to our world is nothing to do with the circus of its facade but to an enforced and imposed 'austerity' of broad spectrum subjection that  are humanly unthinkable in not just the suffering - but as the commitment to denial of Life as the basis for remaking a world in the image of its 'gods' of possession and control.

Insofar as this presents itself as a achievement rising even to 'Heaven' it will reveal itself as the babel of separate agendas of conflicted chaos as a breakdown of communication - because that is what denial 'does' in uniting against a greater fear of exposure - otherwise running as 'private self interest' masking as social concern and acceptability.

A subject specific approach to healing is firstly a relational willingness to pause (from reactivity), listen for resonant recognition (practical insight or prompt) and align in actions and associations or relationship and communication that unfolds a reintegrative solution. This is also a path of growing a consciousness of conscious willingness that is a re-educative and rehabilitating way of life. It isn't just to get rid of an 'interruption' to 'my life' so as to persist in the denial of the messengers or feedback to a deeper or hidden dissonance that is coming up to be recognised and released.

Whatever we deny becomes drawn into our experience - when that denial is a demonising or negatively charged rejection. Aligning in wholeness is not the demonising of the flagged or framed 'threat'.

That is the baiting of an identity in conflict that seeks to delay acceptance of Life in fear of loss of self.

It seeks the sustainability of conflict by reframing identity in righteous overriding denials of anything that would disclose its lack of true substance. And assign its hateful motive to its targets.

True Sustenance is relational integrity that extends its qualities in true 'with-ness' as willingness of true 'worth-ship'.

Can we be with ourselves when we meet the 'other'?

Not as a mind-should but as an ongoing willingness to learn TO be with ourselves and each other?

We already know how to ritually re-enact all kinds of social masking - even without having to notice we do it. And adopt all kinds of roles as part of inherited and acquired strategies of survival.

But when the social order breaks down we find we cannot 'do' or lose support for doing what once worked.

This is the opportunity for a re-evaluation instead of a re-enactment of the same sense of lack in 'New Robes'.