The Apple i-Doll ... and a deep sleep fell upon Adam

in reply to a comment at:

I had the idea of the Apple i-Doll.

Make your own i-Life' and be free to do ANYTHING you want with it - and don't forget the code for waking up from the experiential extension to your own thought control.

... and a deep sleep fell upon Adam.

Terror and horror are the proofs of sin. But the Cross was not merely a precursor to Big Brother's Boot on the face of a true Presence - but a witness for waking up.

What you choose to USE anything for is your i-Life.

Or you can relinquish a private will and its conflicted world for a living presence that is known by sharing.

Fixating on horror does not heal it, but it may reveal a need FOR healing.

The use of evils and grievances for private agenda is a key to freeing our mind.

Sufficient unto the day are the evils thereof, means own and address what is coming up within the day you give to Life so as to share it.

Power of Mind given to hate generates hateful results. But it is not a separate power so much as a wish to use power for a separate or private agenda - set over and against the whole and therefore your Brother - who is Brother by virtue sharing in the same life and not by a gender.

When you have no use for hate, how will it maintain your employ?

I am not picking on you - but on the normalisation of an anti-nature.

If you had to choose joy OR grievance - instead of trying to make them one through some sort of narrative identity complex - would there really BE a choice is the true nature of the choices and their outcomes were in the Clear?

Can we motivate and align in the power of true desire instead of trying to coerce a 'resistant and reluctant nature' to conform and comply to the stick of guilt and fear?

Does our sense of investment in power or control operate a self reinforcing feedback of the need to control and of the systems and devices of control - such as to keep the god of terror alive by which to maintain the subjective prison for the sake of the guards employ?

You have something right in your installation - in that Life (in the body) IS suffering - as the Buddha teaches and as the Cross teaches. Transcendence of the body-limiting mind is moving past the subjection of its fixation that dissociates to a world or surface reality of temporary 'escape' into which of course the fear leaks or breaks in, breaks down and kills.

The conditions we cultivate in our self, our relations and environment can be deeply compassionate without projecting our hates and fears onto them as if to then fix them or make them feel better - and this was was I commonly met when I experienced a completely unexpected suicide of one I love dearly. Many cannot think or meet or deal with horror and so they distance by affecting to care and in so doing, wanted me - in agony of loss - to help THEM feel better. Do you see that it was not their fault - for they know not what they do?

The 'separative' mind is structured to a fear-driven denial as its survival - but I do not accept this as the true of being - but as what we have 'made' of life - through the wish to run our own version through a capacity to deny or become unmindful of what Is (true).

There IS a Call to heal but it is not recognised under a call to vengeance. A call to hate seems like a call to sympathy when masked in a framework of justified compliance or indeed sacrifice.

And note that if the oppressed have struggled for identity under oppression, that is worthy of honouring in order to grow beyond - in right timing of a free willingness, just as we need to be able to embrace our feelings truly to at some point rise in free willingness to embrace life anew.  Resurrection is a true honouring release of the past - but its blessings remain with us. Love waits only on willingness to share it - but the shock of love lost is a traumatic 'separation' of alienation from our Life, that affects our species over millennia - not just specific times and places and events.

I hold we 'devolved from Consciousness by the way - and so I don't call on the same witnesses as the myth of slime evolving through predation as a blind urger to persist. I see the blind urge to persist as the energetic structure of an identification in using the body lovelessly; the iDoll.