Framed by a Dispossession

https://off-guardian.org/2019/05/01/zero-percent-of-elite-commentators-oppose-regime-change-in-venezuela/?replytocom=154772#respond

in reply to the above:

Mortal terror and fear of pain of loss, underlies all tyranny. Have you another view?

Framed in terror is the struggle of defence against it - and the emulation and alignment within it.

The conventional commenting framework reiterates the same themes repeatedly.

Human conditioning reiterates the same themes repeatedly.

How you choose to frame your reality is up to you.

But the ability of mind to recognise a framing is the shifting from a distorted and conflicted reality to a recognition of coherence.

It is the nature of the mind to see what does not fit or support its framing as dissonant, ridiculous or offensive.

As for C02 - the life-giving must be demonised in order to frame the self-destruction as attractive, salvatory or a necessary moral sacrifice.

Framing of the mind in its own thinking is our capacity for self-illusion.

And in a sense - the 'self' illusion.

Usurping of the true by the false MUST be a giving up of the true to the false and CANNOT be an actual power set over and against true.

Does that have relevance for Venezuela?

The wielding of the US proxy for global tyranny.

My last comment was a responding 'installation' to BigB's post, reflecting perennial themes in terms of modern tech-induced dissociations - and while it did not specifically address Venezuela, the situation in Venezuela - as part of our new world disorder is not a separate symptom or disease from the body politic - which is also the politic of the Corps.

Framing in the corporate is a resonant correspondence to the 'love of form' associated with 'Satan' - or form based reality AS the ONLY truth - which as a world MUST rule out the Creative from a mind to possess and control.

Insofar as we are invested in and participant in this world, the practical issue is the basis of our guidance or 'intel'. Because EVERYTHING else is subordinated to its framing interpretation.

The usurping of 'intel' is mind-control. But always by the agreement or consent of the subject but through the framing in deceit. Nonetheless, the decision to act as if something is true is and act of acceptance and belief and investment of identity that then automatically elicits protection or defence. Mind-capture is where the subjects operate the protection and enforcement of their own unfreedom. 

How is it possible that power of life and in life be brought so low?

For Life is not absent.

But is the rendering of such a conflicted and limited state an actual and active choice being enacted as direct and lawful consequence of ideas being given acceptance, investment and allegiance?

Are we running on false or indeed a deceitful 'intel'? - under a notional security that operates a law of diminishing returns?

Beneath the sideshow are surely such an entangled mess of dependencies, that anything true has to be denied because it would reveal the lie in any of innumerable facets that cannot then be limited and so any part of a hateful and deceitful system is deemed 'too big to fail' and given not only protection but persists as an ongoing sacrifice of the living to the dead. So give them narratives of diversionary shock fear to leverage hope of saving from a 'framedevil' by which to feel 'morally justified' by compliance of investment that makes it their own.

Time can waste as well as being wasted.

Under shock-doctrine time is collapsed to a fight flight imperative. YOU MUST ACT NOW TO SAVE the Planet, humanity, the polar bears, your children, the future, your self.

This is the undermining and overriding of the mind 's capacity to monitor its own thought - and the hack by which to induce belief by reaction of invested identity.

Does fear MAKE you powerless or do you GIVE power to fear.

Where you go for your 'intel' remains your choice - always. But you must see that the usurping of a mind under fear operates to block out and deny any other voice.

There is a basis for self-governance that has not 'sold itself' to fear.

This means owning and reviewing our conflicts and contradictions with a willingness to uncover healing, integrative opportunity and practical ways to grow and embody trust in place of hates and fears born of judgement set in private and polarising agenda of possession and control. Its framing is hidden only by our willingness to focus within or through its limiting belief.

If you want to possess reality in form, you limit your reality. The form does not DO it to you - nor another who invites you to share the form. But the invested identity in form sets up an addictive 'hungry ghost' by which to seem possessed of an insatiable lack. Driven by compulsion and weaponised to defend control of supply.