DNA within structured water serves informational matrix of life?

in response to the themes in:

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

Tam: at some 20 minutes into the session there is some talk of data storage in DNA:

I assume this is synthetic DNA, since the actual structure of the DNA we allegedly have inside us was never shown to exist in the way or form they teach us in school?

 For what it's worth, I see the DNA model as  a framework of thought set on or over structured/structuring water- as the energetic/informational matrix and medium for qualities or feeling tones of such richness as  infinitely greater than any quantitative 'storage'. "It's Life Jim, but not as we know it."
Likewise the life we think we know is a quantitative flux of representational experience as feedback to our creative Spirit through a framework of shifting 'image, concept and meanings'.

The 'separateness' of ego seeks to hack and control  its already but ignored, discarded & denied Self.
Or knowing not what we do, we attack and undermine our medium of communication, guidance and support.

I note the crystalline lattice of molecular structure of EZ water shares hexagonal characteristics with graphene sheets. Prometheus seeks to steal the light (already given) for his proprietary use within the materially defined framework. True Inherence is of resonant alignment, a false or mis-taken inheritance seeks  to regain a lost sense of order, as a progressive futility toward its starting predicate as a release or reset of the pattern.

The nature of inheritances  has been cloaked by ideas that set rules and filters for accepted identity - but it is a mask of predictive controls running on 'dead concepts' to which we are to sacrificially align in as a blind technologism running the program of 'making safe'.

Proteins and nano particulates interact within the energy fields that are shimmering, to the resonant patterns that speak through the medium.

Look at the use of human minds for group-think compliance, there is clearly a learned perception response model in place that 'stores' information - but at cost of a hollowing out to robotic function.
The nature of a physical reflex of protective survival, is become the persistent framework of context for a threat-based predictive modelling - set by power struggle or conflicted premises.
Garbage in; garbage out.

The nature (or anti-nature) of a deceit is to reverse the order of life

The nature (or anti-nature) of a deceit is to reverse the order of life

in response to the themes in:

 https://off-guardian.org/2023/03/10/the-forced-medication-of-all-citizens/

I remain interested in the physiological and psychic effects of the lie and the father of it, but aware that none of them are true cause.
The nature (or anti-nature) of a deceit is to reverse the order of life - such that illusion is held true while truth is framed false, treacherous and threatening fear, pain and loss.

Looking at the basis of beliefs that reinforce seemingly benign or protective defences against perceived evils, opens them to question. For example I have just followed the documented trail of the assumption, use and protection of the LNT - Low No-Threshold model for risk of 'bio-damage'*

Firstly radiation was studied at huge overdose on fruit flies hoping to find mutation as the proof of evolution and was falsely claimed (chromosome damage was misinterpreted within a race for a Nobel prize). Within this was the claim of no safe dose - and of the the model of a piggybank effect of cumulative damage over time. (The fruit flies were subjected to 100 million times background radiation levels on the lower dosage experiments). This set the basis for a genetic assumption of zero tolerance approach to disproportionately modelled risk that was hyped by Media to set fear of radiation as a terror narrative in popular concerns that led to prioritising regulatory control or capture, over nuclear tests, but specifically nuclear energy. To the fear-convicted investment in defence this is being made safe and little can reach such a conditioned mind to allow questioning the fear-threat-evil that sets the narrative.

Many other steps to the story but suffice that mammalian study showing a dose threshold and even hormetic response was simply ignored - as was the 10 year study of Japanese WW2 Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors - that found zero evidence of mutations.
The Model - guided and protected by Rockefeller philanthropy was further undermined by the discovery of genetic repair - running against the dogma of fixed genes that only degrade over time.
That work was still falsified to hide a hormetic response (later uncovered) but forced the model to shift from mutative genetic fear to carcinogenic fear. (Cancer is another protected 'industry').
Cancer models are securitised 'science', such that regardless any discovery of real benefit, cure or upstream understanding of the psycho-biological process - no real changes are allowed to undermine the market capture and mindshare. The model - resets, the past forgotten or smeared to remake as backstory for bio-insecurity in need of a fix or weakness over which to wield power by controls set in mask of defences.

The reduction of life to risk modelled management under experts standing within the 'genesis' of biology was intended as a means to regain control in a world where new physics such as quantum effects were seen as threatening the established order. Biology - particularly genetics was identified as the fulcrum by which to reclaim a basis for priority over the expression or movement of any other area or endeavour of life.

This is not to polarise in claiming radiation and other exposures is 'safe' or that inheritances don't have some aspect of expression via proteins - but that partial views overlaid by partiality of private or persona bias sets a scientism of bent or bought 'facts' to base a proprietary technologism claiming to run for a progressive human good, need or salvation from manufactured 'evils' by which to target blame, denial or sacrifice for those who have taken and been given the means to set the narratives or meaning-structure on which to base laws, contracts and enforcements that protect the deceit from disclosure. Not unlike the mutating shifting 'virus' that reflects our own repackaged fears, conflicts and masking denial.

What then is a technologised bio-tech but a nocebo effect set into the populace as emotion-led thinking under systemic and pervasive lockstepped regulatory system - persistently reset by Media feed that astroturfs 'movements' to demand protection for selective 'victims' solely  to vent and expression of targeted blame or hate as an expression of right over others and life.

On surface 'LNT theory is not exciting' but I sought to sketch something to prompt a willingness to give attention to what it has set into global regulatory capture that can run a Flu'Detat via Hypedemic set over a populace whose communication media has been spiked.

*The full series I watched is on
https://hps.org/hpspublications/historylnt/episodeguide.html#
(you tube channel only shows the first half - the latter are the most revealing of corruption by design)
But I first watched one of Calabrese's interviews and was able to discern wide ranging implications that he understates until near the end - not least as an institutional but honest scientist setting a case to his peers.

The basis of an integrative understanding is recognising patterns - within as without - as a basis for releasing them to an embracing perspective.
The attempt to reconstruct wholeness from a life in pieces is 'according to whose plan'.
A fundamental peace runs beneath the mind of a dissociation set in grievance.
When we put aside what is no longer taken to be true, we resume from where we are.
It seems to be awakening because the 'dream' is not here!

Without a fundamental peace or connected life, the mind shifts between 'dreams' of escape that entrap and entangle a masking evasion set as if to become a self-vindication.


 

Triggered or truly moved?

Triggered or truly moved?

in response to the themes in:

 https://tessa.substack.com/p/triggeroo/


#1- to the article:
The identity politicking is when issues are set into truths to be weaponised in war for personal gain or against personal loss - albeit set in the symbol of idol of such a repurposed or proprietary 'truth'.
Identity conflict is the nature of human conflict and ruins 'dark' or beneath the social masking of seeking position or safety within such a conflicted world.

'Non violent communication' is in my view an unfortunate name for a practice of awakened responsibility for opening, uncovering or real relationship, but as per article, those who take good ideas without truly living their meaning will repurpose its 'methods' to an identity that then assumes some superior basis for framing what is in a version of what should be. Fail.
This is the nature of all spiritual or insightful thoughts brought into a conflict-world as a means to heal it. New wine into old paradigm. The ego of identity conflict is predicated to mask over and look what from what is feared and hated to seek what should be - in its own pattern of shifting  'reality adjustments'

The nature of Family Constellation therapy (also applies to systems) reveals the field of knowing that our adaptation, ego or strategy of living is shaped by as a love that is given to a conflicted family and society that we are then an expression of. A key realisation in the revealing of patterns of denial and exclusion passing down generations & cultures is the deep bond between victim and victimiser. An intent to exclude or deny others will always bring them into our field of manifestation as patterns of failed potentials or fulfilments in life and the passing of that to our children.
Learning to read 'the field' is the gift of the Spirit of a willingness to reintegrate - despite or because of no longer being willing to tolerate sacrifice to grievance, however deeply cherished.

The idea of trauma as underlying cause can set us as victims of a past made in anger, set irrevocably in guilt of pain of loss - however directed. But we are only subject to a present ignorance, that can reveal itself to a willingness to see - as distinct from persisting in what we think and perceive through such a lens darkly.

So the disposition to conflict is itself a defence against seeing, set in fear of what would be revealed. How much of our 'power struggle', or sense of struggle under threat is rooted in fear of disclosure to fear of pain, of loss? But set in proxy symbols of displacement so as not to directly feel and know our condition? This is a masking mind defence that blocks awareness of living presence in others to 'adjust' them in our own judgements that are usually more about ourselves than the other if we had pause of willingness to also look within while engaging any relational situation.

There is a shift from mask to presence that uncovers the always already true to the release of a conflicted insistence of demand that life be on my terms - if only in a realm of private imagination seeking support for being lived and known. Such is the drive of a sense of self-lack that reinforces its own fear in the attempt to boost or become. Such is the felt need to control a life that from within such a mind cannot be imagined to embrace and support, guide and delight in our being.

It will shock when we discover our saviour is our enemy no more (ACIM).
The recognition of love is given and received one.
What we think to use to manipulate or contract to terms and conditions that then break is a 'special love' - which is self-contradiction made normal to a deeper mutual agreement to look away from total or unconflicted love. masked, distanced and boosted by self-attack projected to other, to virus to gene or to false saviour peddling magic solutions for delay and diversion of an unreadiness of unwillingness to let love in - for is that not barbarians at the I also use black box science for insider elitism that sets definitions, parameters and modelling as if to have found or discovered from a position of assigned or asserted authority, such as to frame what can be said, seen ,funded, studied, and used as a framework of meaning ofr significance to life defined in such terms.

So the predictive mathematical modelling extended to computer processing is the usurp of science as Natural Philosophy to a proprietary technologism masking in a scientism that is operating a sealed unit - with no user access - as the determiner or enforced ruleset of what life can be or become and how it can move or relate.

Our error is in attacking a false premise as means to claim right. or to reverse that, ITS persistence depends on our attacking a false premise to protect the error against correction.

The understanding or our world is reflecting within. When Jesus said 'as ye do unto (not just the least) ye do unto Me' - that Me is the witness to true Self.
Our consciousness is split as if running from a black box with no user access (the mortal conditioning) to act out core beliefs and definitions running in dark mode.

What we give out sets the measure of what we get back for this is abundance in life. But if we want to F*ck or some equivalent 'hit' of possession or control by using a living relationship for gratifying a private mind set for getting, we are already invested in forgetting and wont recognise our feedback or learn from it, while the mind can compartmentalise or mask and hide anything to keep a bit on the side out of sight - excepting in social agreement to mutual 'getting' as a socially masking blind eye to the movement of the Soul.

Uncovering integrity is the capacity to stop the inner or outer gaslight of open or masked guilting, to be the unavailability to what has no belonging. If we think to stop 'Them' we will find we have a sympathetic resonance with 'Them' that operates like a back door for we will be triggered no matter how we double down in masking over as rationally or justifiably provoked.

This level of consideration runs beneath what we actually are moved to do. The release of an 'enemy projection' from another is not a blank cheque to treat us or others as a doormat!
Turning the cheek is to not meet in ego, but in equity of Spirit.


#2 - cant find the comment this related to:

Unrecognised feedback as messengers of love are killed or denied by the usurping substitution of invested & defended self-illusion claiming sovereignty under rules and filters of a mindset that seeks the wrong to claim the right. This is what we reverse - we look for what is right. This means to look past the lampshade to the light that is there because we did not create ourselves but are of our Creator - regardless anything we can think or make real to ourselves in each other.The contents of the mind are then secondary to that a mind thinks. That thinking is a choice and that choices have results that can be used to choose or think differently as a more fulfilling and less frustrating outcome.
The alternative to uncovering alignment is to play out roles of reinforcement to every changing never releasing patterns of victim and victimiser, one up-man-ship, blame and shame, 'justifying' hate as virtue that must then hate the love that reveals it hollow.
So choose to pause reaction, and to open to other ways to see the situation from a connected presence, and release temptation to set moral judgement over self or others in desire to see in the light of an integrity of being that is a gift of synchrony, not influence or impact.


#3 in response to the themes on despicable propaganda:

Rosemary B
oh yes.
I think we ALL know many many people.
I have learned, even harshly, that sometimes it is better for me to just step away
..... something like "arguing with idiots" or wrestling with pigs is another one.... on one level or another.

Yes - give it nothing.
The lie is a lie no less for being presented in less despicable forms.
Learning to not engage with or look for truth or meaning in lies is a healthy disregard.
'Many people' is often used to generalise as an expression of a relative exceptionalism. Inferring 'not me'. Without demonising speech, it is always fruitful to pause from stepping back from owning our current sense of self integrity
I don't really know 'many people'.
(I nearly wrote without wishing to demonise speech - but immediately noticed an apologetic deference to  stating an intent directly).

I didn't click on the link, I have looked on horror, I am free to look past it.
And grow freedom by living it without apology or justification.
It says "LOOK AT ME!!!" (A sort of 'Stop sign)
Guardians become guards, when we do not live who we are, the unfolding expression of.

At risk of rambling on - swearing on oath was an invocation of a delayed negative penalty or sacrifice to be meted to oneself and family if that word was broken. That was survival in times more starkly set in fear pain sickness and death.
Jesus admonished to take no oath - for this sets up a god of vengeance, instead of giving or yielding up vengeance to a Lord of love - that lords it not over any living one, & that's how we recognise truth. Absent of conflict or coercion.

#4 Reponding to

Tessa Lena

This is such an incredibly complex chemistry. Conspiracies exist without a doubt, but then making up one mind about the "realness" or at least probability of any given conspiracy is a separate issue from how we treat those who view the world differently, etc. etc.
I think I have worn out my computer keys by writing stories about conspiracies :) Here is one take, a conversation with Charles Eisenstein https://tessa.substack.com/p/charles-eisenstein-amnesty

I look to original roots beneath the gorgon heads!
Hiding or masking intent or purpose is a private mind set by defences that support a continuity or persistence of a wish to follow or experience and explore what its offers. (A thread of focus)

This is the same as taking self-imaged reality in place of Self and hiding or masking it from truth feared as adversary or unsupport or rejection of  a 'self' that is then 'naked'  to disclosure and self-dissociating from its own inherent Communication.
"and WHO told you you were naked?" - said the Lord - is not about sex-shame so much as miscreative fear set in its own 'thinking'.
But as Lord is Self or life - this question is eternally given us to undo the lie and the father of it - as we are willing to release a will that 'damns as we go' - that is - its penalty is exacted as the loss of sharing in a true appreciation now - by the attempt to become in our own right or judgement.
But the last judgement was in the first; "Who saw the light was verily Good" as in "This is my Beloved who is my delight" and extended  as the recognition of another as our Self. This is the 'rock' or cornerstone of a truly consecrated relationship to life - across all time and space. True worth-ship shared in true with-ness.
How do we give love to haters or rather those we see hateful? We dont. We give willingness that our perception be corrected to reflect something recognisably true or whole, rather than persist the conditions of reactive defence.

Invested self illusion must seek mutual reinforcements that clique and can then become a basis for insider elitism to align from rules, systems, and controls set in the wish to unconscious autonomy - that would know not what it does, so as to persist an experience of self-illusion, that truly conscious awareness undoes.

I have no right to deny another their self illusion or choice. An appreciation of this would save much wasted effort. But I have the freedom to recognise another in their choices as a gift of life or as a call to remember a gift forgotten or denied. What I give to others is also given to myself, so here is the way to access and release what is unconscious or denied awareness in myself BY projection to 'other'. There is no "I' that can 'Do' this, but I can choose not to do the learned habit to let life move though me, and remind me of an Intimacy that cannot be stored in symbolic representations or biological modelling.
Only - but always now.

#5 in response to the themes in:

Aion
lovely
impactful
probably not a lie
molecules, viruses, flat earth, aliens, bigfoot are independent of the models used to describe them
science, the useful spirit, doubts and checks
those checks yield evidence in support of or against a model
the model will always be an idea, a portrait
a portrait of a pipe is not a pipe
The Science is the new mask of the machine. A tired and used rag draped over unfeeling metal.
Discernment is difficult but essential.

Is a thought outside and independent of the mind that holds it?
Can living thought project a self out from love by loving images set in contradiction?
Such is a 'model' of a projective externalisations set over living thought which is living because it is one in all.
Symbols can be traced back to their resonance of origin as the preverbal activation of awareness to self-consciousness.
Mutating derivatives set a mind of shifting and conflicting 'meanings' that render meaningless by conflict they seem to mask over or escape.
Machine thinking must have been insanely difficult to learn, but became as if a second nature.
Now the difficult is to uncover a persistent and consistent willingness to unlearn - or be released of the purpose that made it.
I agree that our essence or core is a discernment within life and not a reaction to images that phish us into trigeroo!

#6

in response to the themes in:

Guido VANDEVEN

What if the global humanity injured by some calamity, disease or real pandemics has the unwanted purpose to lift us up to a higher leveI of consciousness? I do not value the human body as Saint Francis said brother donkey, my whole life I searched for the ideal homeostasis and to take care of it as long as it holds, but then....there are mystics, Seers, medium and realised people all deadly sick in their body saying that the body is not strong enough to hold, carry an awakening which comes unexpectedly on its own accord and many not wanting it! What if there’s no need for a new world order or a technocracy of which the “elite” disposing of a non affected body, even when that should be possible can never reach because they cling to their material body. If we’re really spiritual beings do we not have to get to that level we’re destined to, even in a condition that it is incurable? Do situations that are irreversible not bring up the best in us? Is only the perfection of health the conditio sine qua non for life as a human in a body? I’m a sociopath or even worse a psychopath but that’s my gut feeling in all this psychodrama of this C19 mind game. The human species can only evolve in shocks and yes triggers are needed not to say welcome.

To use 'what if' or modelling imagination to unstick the mindset and open resonance in fresh appreciation is wisdom when rooted in self-honesty of being.

The ability of the ego-defence or 'stuck mindset' to incrementally absorb and subvert any process of education to better defend its stuckness does call for or rather calls forth shocks of what may seem a violating or humiliating awareness by which to realign or reintegrate with what is, and release what reveals to have never really been as it seemed.

The tangibility and visibility of you as your body - gross through to subtle - is of a unique signature vibration. Like a covenant between you and your Creator. No one else can intrude, but you invite them or accept their invitation. Or put it this way - your life - all of it - is your gift to and of the whole that is beyond all concept. So give freedom to others to their themes or explorations, that serve them as yours you. That doesn't prevent me living such witness as I am moved to share to any moment of a resonance already moving.
I'm not so into human specimens, I see normalising self-hate in regarding ourselves as 'humans' rather than human being. And humans set as cancer or virus on the planet - cast as victim by which our guilt is stamped, coined and sold to slavery.
Human thinking can set predictive modelling (what if) in place of or masking as 'what is'.
Reality never responds to being 'attacked'.
"But don't let truth get in the way of a good story!"

The idea of evolution has application in a 3D linear sense of process or progress from an ignorance to an enlightenment, but creative shift is 'everything shifts'. We have no mind to objectify this - any more than our models really provide more than an illusion of predictive control overlaid on the movement of being.

St Francis loved donkeys too! 

#7

Tessa Lena

I have my own theory about many of those things, maybe I will write about it one of these days. It sounds like we agree on many things. I am not sure from your comment if you think that the notion of viruses is critical to the justification of tyranny or not... on my end, I think that tyrants have found ways to push through propaganda and / or violence for centuries,and they don't depend on whether people believe in viruses or not, they depend on people being generally not free on the inside, for whatever reason. As far as sitting on the fence, I don't think many people on this Substack or any of the ones you listed are in that position :)

The underlying signature theme given representation in the pathogenic hacking hijacking disease contagion can be recognised as a mind-hack using trojan solutions. It can be traced to the tyrannies of thought that essentially marketise and weaponise life seeking control of narratives, currencies and necessities of common need.
The experiential Field of experience is never without our participation.
The word we give corrupts - but we may outsource to 'authority' of a presentation stamped by the past as being 'protected' and receive life through its control filters.
The demonising of life in any scapegoat - real or imagined is the basis to trigger or justify attack as 'righteous'. The modern way uses models that collectivise sacrifice as virtue according to the modelling of 'the science'.
The actual or real nature of resonant communications triggering all kinds of physical and mental response or disease is much richer than 'rogue code' that didn't exist so we had to invent it! (Transfecting mRNA) which Is but another mutation of the WISH to replicate live as an iDoll under Genetic Control. When that is revealed baseless - but not without a spanner in the works/wrench in the gears - we'll become aware if not already of the intent to hack the Biofield using nanoparticulate structures of bi-technical convergence. It is undeway - but is that 'true' just because billions are invested to tout PR to investors of all the wonderful applications?
Theramos is a rare example of losing face in the game.
Genetics is really inheritances assigned to proteins as 'controllers'. Living water folds and mediates structures of informing and energetic information. The Rockefeller 'science' is bent to reduce all to a binary of control under global monopoly. (yes control is running out of control!)
Elitist insiders of institutional or corporate management engage in risk management. But risk modelling soon became a means of predictive control working the mind of fear - set by falsified science into regulatory capture, and self sacrificing denial to a false sense of life, resilience, and adaptive growth - not just survival - but resolving and releasing of conflicted self manifesting toxic conflict (and cover stories)

#8

Great distinctions Tessa. The language aspect is important - words are maps of the territory being discussed, not the territory itself. This itself is important to keep in mind.
It is further complicated by so many of our exchanges being written, and online, and thought out only in our own minds... whereas oral cultures created knowledge by way of negotiation - one person speakes and then the other feeds back their take, until common ground is found.
Further complicating matters still are the biases of particular languages, in particular English, which color our perceptions. This includes the syntax of sentences.
Your point is particularly well-taken that it is helpful to accept how much we don't really know, since so much of what is considered objective are models. Some would argue that objectivity itself is questionable, as it is all based on projections - I think this is one of the complexities humanity is dealing with in general right now.
What I find is that there are a precious few things I actually can know, and they are usually learned through suffering and compassion. When we get down to such root things, we can begin to rebuild a consensus reality. This is why TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION processes are so important, for they take into account the SUBJECTIVE experience of numerous parties, especially victims of violence or genocide. And from these perspectives, we can hone in on a common reality again. Indigneous perspectives are particularly important in so many ways including this one. As we strive to overcome the current push by bosses to colonize all of humanity and life, we can learn much from those who have been resisting this assault for 500+ years. Grateful to you <3

I agree as long as we don't sacrifice the Spirit of the movement of being to methodologies of applied insights.
Reintegration is a releasing of a revealed 'dis-integrity' energised by mutual patterns of reinforcement. No one comes home alone! Release and be released.
And yet the freedom to accept is a recognition of integrality not a requirement of moral guilting. I know there is no sense of this in what you say, apart from perhaps specially addressing victims - which is a primary vector for wielding power as morally proscribed correctness (gaslighting).
The more insightful the tools brought into our world the more insidious their misapplication.
True forgiveness of our sins in others releases both. This is not a double edged sword that turns against its user to trap them in their own making.

#9
I spent the morning in the themes and comments.
I received a morning of shared qualities and resonance of being!
But one last note that conscious resonance could be seen as conscious activation.
While unconscious resonance 'triggers' a reactive pattern in like kind.
If we consent to let it run.

The love that we would do

 in response to the themes in:


https://tessa.substack.com/p/nature-of-good-and-evil/


The love that we would do or have, meets opposition, adversity, sabotage, indifference, rejection, treachery and betrayal.
Defences are raised in response to evils perceived without...and within.
We invest our self in that which protects who and what we accept our self to be.
We inherit or acquire identity from that which sets a self in hate and self-righteous grievance.
This robs us of the awareness of the truth we are and share, without a thought, word or doing.
Unaware of That we Are of a love beyond form, we struggle in shifting and conflicting 'identities' taken in vain and enacted as futility, because there is no substitute for love that can have and hold, cherish and share in the qualities and nature that love is and does through us whole, already!
So invested in our wanting love to set our own world order, we make of love a getting or manipulating mask as the praise and blame of world set in contractual terms and conditions of permission to feel, to move and to know ourselves moved - that we are unaware of consenting to at the level of giving our reality to power set outside of the presence of life's unfolding expression, while identifying in and of a social masking survival of conflicting and conflicted wishes and purposes given priority and set into a world of forms and bodies as if an autonomy of separate selves and things, that All the king’s horses and all the king’s men, can never put back together again! And so a war that cant be won, a task that cant be completed, a reality that cant be fulfilling, becomes our sense of solid continuity for a masking evasion taken to be or set terms for our 'life', that rises up to be stamped down by a past made in anger, that God, that others, that your life and world did not recognise, accept, support of join with who you wanted to be!
Terms and conditions are revealed by our reactions, and of others reactions to our actions.
Now allow that predictive modelling as a sense of self-autonomy running private agenda - set in or seeking social or collective reinforcement, to react to what we fear will happen again. Fear of pain of loss that transfers to our social masking in rituals of agreement to join while always keeping a back door, a sting somewhere in our tail, a guard ready to come forth should 'reality' be broken.
And this is 'who' we meet in others for 'love' can shift or flip to fear in an instant.
We thought to make love and made robots, not because we wanted a hollow world set in shadow powers in ghastly parody of life, but because we thought to set rules to image and form as a desire for autonomy. We make idols by grasping from a sense of lack and limit and be-living our result as boosting a sense of lack in power to persist and grow a self for getting and for defending against being 'got from' or robbed of 'even the little that ye hath'.
The word 'God' and also 'Love' is masked in or taken for vanity of masking presentations to our self and to others, so as to means anything and nothing to mind and world predicated on their replacement, but before thinking or doing anything, as well as while we think and do, and after all is said and done, "You are My Beloved Expression that Is My delight".
This (paraphrased) rendition of the Holy Spirit of Re Cognition is given and received one.
True resonance opens total Communication, or rather is what Communication is and does.
There are no separate parts to run on private energy supplies taken from the living to feed the dead.
But we may see deeply invested defences set in masking rules and filters by which to clingon to a self-specialness set over and apart from 'the wind that moves all things, yet never itself is seen'.
Releasing old learned or acquired habit-response may reveal a complex of belief that no longer serves who you know and accept yourself to be. But it is not required to set an internal witch hunt to let life in, to be truly moved and to know in the being of the qualities of a life we need only accept as is to be unselfconsciously one with, in our day. Nor is this anything but the call to joy, now. Sufficient unto the day be the evils thereof. We suffer an ignorance of the present as the weighted stamp of an irrevocable past. Love is miraculous, and not a manufactured or predictively modelled risk assessment set to rules and filters against pain of loss.
Yet love is not coercive - THAT is how you know!
Tolerance for pain is not infinite. Persisting in what cannot work into pain and denial masked 'unconscious' or death will meet a tipping point of questioning the foundations or core beliefs and definitions of self and reality - AS the stirring of a true curiosity - beneath any 'thinking' of manufactured 'solution'.

From out of a forced regenesis set in fraud & futility

in response to the themes in:

https://tessa.substack.com/p/american-chenobyl/

 

 

Curiously after not commenting a prompt to invite a reframe of your perspective I 'bumped into the to me new- but long standing scandal of LNT theory with regard to radiation toxicity. Linear Non-threshold as the idea of 'no safe dose' and all doses cumulative. Just the ticket for a bio-insecurity state of life-denial posing as protection by distorted or inflated risk set as fear management.
Dr Edward Calabrese appears to be the chief whistle blower in false science that misrepresents from the ground up - in a pattern that is of course characteristic of our times.
Firstly seeking Nobel to prove gene the dogmatic or religiously held conviction of mutagenesis as a result of background radiations. Muller bombarded fruit flies with 100 -200 million times background radiation to seek mutations that could be seen as inherited traits - in those few not killed or sterilised. (By contrast I can imagine an Emoto experiement of directing appreciation to fruit flies as an invitation to share in it - I wonder if this would access the actual 'mechanism' of evolution as unfolding of rich qualities of life instead of as linear 'progress' that by definition kills its own father as an drive to become that is undone even as it rises to fall away from attempts to grasp it.
Muller believed he'd found mutagenic proofs (in the same false grasp) to bolster the dominant 'thinking' that would kill the Father to recast genesis in the image of the machine operator, the Scientist attended by his technological extensions.
Results of these flawed experiments gave the LNT premise that became the basis for radiation protocols as well as to feed the idea of accumulative exposures as a cause of cancer.
For both personal gain, narrative manipulations of political and emotional bias – and later the marketisation and weaponisation of fear to bolster biogenetic theory, funding and development into narratives of captive control that extend to casting nuclear power in a demonic light under impossible regulatory constraints as a rival to energy cartel monopoly.

I confess to an anti nuclear stance through my life as a result of the demonic legacy it carries as well as the sense of 'Chernobyls'. However I have previously read things abour A bomb survivors and the thriving of life in the Chernobyl nature reserve that opened a willingness to question if the world is in fact as we are led to believe within shock-horror that may have true facets that are distorted to gain function for dark or private agenda. Private Keep Out – DANGER! (radioactive sign).
Not to throw the baby out with the bathwater but that hormesis is the nature of nature to up-regulate as a result of stress or challenge. Adapatation - principally via bacterial symbiosis - is the nature of life to the challenges it generates out of its own 'themes' or explorations. But life as embodiment of qualities that hold the one (of unifying resonant harmonics) in the Many as the Many in one. Both at once.
Our human conditioning is set in past experience as a present framework that runs far deeper than what we call conscious as a mere mapping schemata in which to think we are as we think it is.
So belief set in and by fear or shock can hold all the energy of the convictions set or shaped in the 'consciousness' by the trauma. Nocebo is not just superficial self-negative beliefs but a deep conviction unlidded by a diagnosis, a medical 'test' or a news 'story'.
Our capacity for dissociation is not simply FROM a presumed normal of relationship, but as a split from a true Father, Nature or Source to a grasp at becoming forever set in futility of a drive to become what we already are from a conviction set by guilted fear, conflicted hate and the self-protective recoil to a masking protection that casts out away from a split off self to 'save itself' against an Everything cast in demonic fear & threat thereby.

There is another facet in all this that is not evident as the basis for our common or mutually reinforced experience of a physical reality as an exclusively external self-existing 'think-thing'.
For the 'Dissociation', 'Separation' or Fall' runs a device by which experience seems to be projected out as a reality defining and subjecting from Out There.
Giving and receiving are one in truth however masked or passed off. False with-ness receives not a love it actively withholds even when extended in truth.
Giving fear as a mask over conflict seeking or demanding defences boosters, will meet a conflicted and self-reinforcing 'reality-reflection'.
Somewhere in our acquired and inherited strategies and responses are choices running as driven compulsions that dictate or violate as a sense of powerlessness to fear that reached to horror or terror, associated with disgust and hate.
Attempts to DO love as a weapon or power over fear, mask in false virtues that block the awareness as the movement of our being whole.
From which to be truly moved rather than reactively defined.
Such moments of connected presence have practical application as life, but not as hostage to a victimhood seeking power in the measure that it was set by and accepted.
Judge not, because we cant be apart from or set over (but to self-illusions given priority over true).
This is a negative way of saying 'abide with', keep the way open or watch and pray!
That we fall asleep to the world is hardly surprising. And yet is used to blame as if a failure or betrayal. Forgiveness releases judgement to our true presence - not to a pretence.
The body as a limit is temporary, but to use body for communication of life releases the masking armour of a past or future that is not here, now.
No one can add to what they have and are by taking thought for themselves, but yielding to our source and nature aligns within all That we truly are - beyond any think we can thing.
Self-hate runs hidden, but its revealing can be a call to release from our experience - if it be your will.
Of course it feels shit! But that cant be THE focus. Seeking to know what love is, does not presume to already know the way - but trusts to recognise truth revealing. Of course.

Self-specialness and a threatening world

 in response to the themes in or from:

https://off-guardian.org/2023/02/18/paranoia-is-it-always-a-bad-thing/

Self-specialness is necessarily associated with a  threatening world.
Not because the world is seeking to destroy it but because reality does not uphold it.
This is experienced as threat, against which are defences raised. Not least being a pre-emptive strike on reality by a mind set in its own judgemental perception-response as justified and real.
Distancing and masking operate a withdrawal of and from intimacy of felt participance to a defence system predicated on or stamped by its past, as basis for fear, pain and loss, along with bolstering and boosting controls against reliving or being overwhelmed by fear, pain and loss.

The self we make or mis-take as real in image is an adaptation to and learning of a masked reality.
It is not who or what we are as we can observe it in act. But it was made to 'make you safe' in terms of both inner conflicts and intolerable or overwhelming experience. Mental verbal development is superstructure to a realm of experience that the surface attention is trained to mask over or mask out.

What wasn't sketched here is the social or mutually reinforced nature of masking agreement that set polarised identities in terms of self-lack driven for GETTING from external sources of fulfilment that only feed the sense of lack as compulsive or addictive driven behaviours, to hollow out the seekers, in parody of life framed in stimulated intensity.
Those experiencing loveless denials are baited to grievance and loss that gives power to the oppressor, yet seeks that power in vengeance for self-vindication of wounds protected against healing.

Ill or false-gotten gains carry fear of exposure to invalidity of claim or possession. The ego's answer is to blot truth from the mind, save when it can be invoked to boost or bolster its claim against potential threat. A living death is taken as if 'getting away with it', while being in a sense taken by anowned fears deeper into defence set against the light. Of awareness at rest in its own being.

Perhaps the lock on the prison is the conviction of irrevocable guilt, such that whatever love was or might have been, is nothing to do with what you have become. Hatred of self & life are intolerable and must cast out its conflicts to 'offset' pain to its relationships, body and world - past & future.

No way for light to get in equates to no escape.

While there will be associations with population imbalance and fragmented dissociation running as established order set in fear of feared pain and loss.

Self conflicting themes can be temporarily entertained or even time-share a mind in switching in the flash of and eye and back, but at cost in death and taxes, such as to pitch toward a tipping point if not released to a re-connecting basis from which to live.

So while there is the drama of war seeking possession and control set in ancient hatreds that flow down the generations unhealed & protected by the setting of defences against them, the core fact I see is of our alignment with our Created being - by the releasing of the self-judgement 'repackaged' as life and world, which of course we of our 'self' cannot do.
But what we can do is be aware and on purpose in what we do, such as to release the distancing mask of fragmented busyness or dissociation to a freedom to being truly moved, as to not moving to a false call. The exposure of what had been masked out will likely pass through periods of deep unsettling, that is the need for healing unheeded or unrecognised.
To come back into a true and truly shared appreciation from a mind set otherwise is an acceptance of life in place of a denial set as salvation from fear set by vengeance.

Don't know mind or beginners mind, is the simplicity of the movement of a curiosity that asks to receive of That which knows - in all - equally.

Many seem to choose to die rather than release active ignorances.
Many seem to choose to die fighting within an active ignorance.
Many come here but to suffer a while and die.
But no one can completely eradicate the spark of life that is their truth and nature, however dedicated or persistent the attempts.

The Gift of Spirit is a turnaround of a mind/world reversal. Because the lie and the father of it have never more than captured and masked the mind that took it for a spin where thinking made it so from the psychic-emotional intensity of Separation trauma projected to a world by which to hide.
Turnaround as the gift of a world by which to heal - not in my terms to fit my conditions. But to a truly shared recognition of worth, value, appreciation, gratitude.

Our liability as mind is to seek to short cut the primary and fundamental step of receiving at Source - by running off to sell 'solutions' we do not embody.
There are practical considerations regards thieves and predatory 'salesmen' but no technique can substitute for a grounded and centred peace. if we habitually refuse to be so aligned, it is not the fault of the shadows we draw nigh.

Airbrushing a World of Perceptions

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2023/01/31/how-to-memory-hole-a-psyop/

Surely the correspondence between a masking deceit and a world - or rather mind set in self-illusion is more interesting than yet another war on -whatever?

The mind is invoked to 'make us safe' in terms of a masking diversionary self justifiction that operates like apples in Eden, as a mutually self-reinforcing narrative, mind or purpose.]

In this case the purpose is to protect the mask by which the conflict can be delayed, persisted in, or airbrushed into normality.

At some point Alien Disclosure will be a foreign or alienated basis of thinking that cannot know or feel the life it is is invoked to protect within the frame of the self-conflicted judgement or trauma, that invoked control within fear as a denial and diversionary dissociation.

It sort of works to keep love and light out, but requires constant sacrifice to boost its narratives, we get a bit of time in which to think some more, but all the power and responsibility has been cast from a subjected grievance onto an overwhelming Other.

What could 'save us' but another 'power' by which to excommunicate or eradicate it. Thus the archetypal battle of good v evil - relative to the ever shifting context of the different and conflicting lights in which we 'see'.

This is not to abandon what works without a felt sense of a better way, but if fighting demands a sacrifice of integrity seen as morally justified, then we love to hate while scoring credits in fake virtue. Because the virtues and qualities of life are integral to life and not gotten or claimed over anothers death or denial.

No one in war-mind can afford (in their terms) to listen to anything that would call in to question their war set in vengeance and personal vindication as justice.

But nor can I afford to indulge a negative thought - that is a thought that undermines my awareness of integral sovereignty - of being - if I accept it as truth set over and apart from life.

yes - we can think this in every which way, and make all kinds of controversial issues to engage in, but truly positive or living thought is integrative and not born of lack or fear seeking solution. Bringing question or desire to know to a true presence, releases the problem to life that then recasts a perspective OF presence, rather than repackaging the problem as IF a solution, from the conviction the problem defines reality (that's you and I too).

Everything of the mindset for getting works against knowing what we know, or if you prefer to obfuscate and divert from true knowledge, so it will always always always give you some thing you should or must do - such as to set hoops through which to pass to get to the fulfilment that never truly comes. Substitution for love cannot do more than invoke sacrifice to an imagery of life. (That turns to grievance of abandonment, rejection, treachery and betrayal). Here is where we came in! That is here is the original pattern that set a split mind, now revealed as a choice you do not have to accept, but for 'old normals' that cannot be got back - let alone the Golden Age.

The erasure of consciousness to a groupthinking bot-net under systemic control, is the victory of the intent toward unconsciousness and death as a final solution to pain.

Will such an 'answer' be any more fulfilling in addressing the true call or need beneath the pain? I cant speak for another, but once smitten by a truth that undoes what I thought to be, I cannot truly WANT unconsciousness or the blind eye that keeps private agenda hidden in broad sight, especially as I uncover that the cost of such a solution locks into its problem. I do not want immunity to the truth of love even if self awareness uncovers deep conflicts that call for healing, for release, for undoing.

Jack wont go back into his box, but perhaps there are those who are willing to contract such a compression to take the ride that it gives them.

There is freedom to follow the thinking that you give acceptance to, but there is not infinite capacity to abide pain no matter how ingeniously repackaged and redistributed

I walk away from Omelas, for I do not accept sacrifice as the law by which your slavery or diminishment, is my freedom or aggrandisement. Equity in being is of a different order than lack driven possession and control. "It's Life Jim – but not as we thought to know it"

Can Freedom be Medically Defined?

 in response to the themes in:

What's Happening in the Medical Freedom Movement?

 https://tessa.substack.com/p/mfm-healing/

 Unless we redeem back to truth that heals, we persist in a 'pathology of the psyche' - or rather of the mind that takes a seeming call to war from a sense of being attacked or unjustly denied by Others - be that people or world (or gods & demons such as virus and vaccine).

The idea of a medical freedom movement is already an artefact of a medicalisation of health - and the pharmacological marketing of such 'medications' for 'medically' defined sickness.

Those invested in  pharma-interventions to suppress or fix a 'broken or unsecure' biological mechanism, may march against mandatory experiment while defending protection racket that they are dependent on.
The idea of freedom as being free of checks and balances - such are natural consequence - drive the deregulation of any conscious governing service, for a freedom to GET maximal profit for minimal cost - not least by outsourcing the pain to those who demand unconsciousness as their 'freedom' from pain arising from a mis-guided or mis-aligned sense of thought, feeling, speech & behaviour.

The limiting, and sacrificially destructive core of a false image or model of life is rising to awareness as a 'death cult' - at which point the Many want old normal back (buy some more time).
But there is not going back to not knowing what we know - but the attempt drives deep self-betrayal with amplified destructive consequence.

What is rarely understood is that 'normalised dissociation from pain - or unconsciousness packaged to socially masked behaviours, is unnatural, but passes for life by keeping the sacrifice hidden or masked as virtue or necessity by narrative substitutions and truth we are not ready or as yet unwilling to face, to own and thus to release unto healing.

The nature of defences against healing are anything that passes as false solution or anything that passes as threat that calls for sacrifice Now!  - Or Else!.

What and where Is life?
What Is freedom?

We have made each and together our own versions of life, self and world. But we can only truly join and share in the love of truth and the truth of love. War has no time for anything that would undermine its cause - and now as the Final Battle of Good v Evil, shall any and everything born or breathing be  sacrificed to The Cause?

For such is the 'worship' of evil that is 'justifies' or gives basis for claim to attack and deny anyone, override anything, in terms of a lesser paying to save from a greater evil. Thus vaccine damage is but a corollary or side effect to the Cause - that holds back The Terror. Denying freedom the 'sad but necessary 'cost' to SAVE from Planetary Catastrophe.
But it never was about climate or health or life at all - but about leverage and control over life running as if to serve or protect and empower.
Grievance given power becomes a tool for breaking life from within.

Medicine that serves grounding, centring and aligning in wholeness is not really Outside life, but can seem to be from the mind of a masking control over separation and struggle within itself - as if releasing defences would let evil rush in.
See how it is by our own defences that we generate such dissociations as to progressively lose our feelling of life to an masking armour.
This need not be!

In another galaxy far far away

in response to the themes in:

 

 https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/are-vaccines-triggering-cancers-vaccine/

 

 

In another galaxy far far away were a people who believed in pathological biology - don't laugh!–it set them in a prison that bound ever tighter with every seeming escape or solution.
From biota as disease germ, came invisible nano-germs called viruses, that took on every kind of mutating trick to outsmart the attempt to eradicate them, so as to reveal themselves as genetic code that hacked living cells, injected code that took them over to replicate more pathology, that then left the cells to infect other cells , to then leave the organism to attack other organisms. Life could only survive by an 'immune system' that itself could be hacked into attacking itself, and yet required constant boosting against an overwhelming risk of sickness, pain and loss, indicated by various biomarkers of fluctuating levels of various tests that were related to various theories as to how sickness could be suppressed , where treatments were generally toxic and causing greater ills than letting be.

Yes such is the power of a fearful imagination set loose from a naturally felt being, that the mind itself was denied a role in the body - after the metaphorical horse had already escaped the stable door, such that thinking was locked down to materially caused symptoms for which only material solutions & interventions were officially allowed. But that only kept the people in the dark when biological shocks resulted in physical symptoms - often when the healing phase was active, such as to see healing as sickness and completely miss the cause while mistreating the patient.
In this way of seeing, the disease is very powerful, so the treatment has to be more so - even at risk of collateral damage or side effects, but when the treatment killed it was always seen as the disease won the battle, and more money was called up to boost an immunity that was only really applicable to the 'treatment industrial complex'.

Yes the people lived as caged laboratory specimens by their own choice! Believing that Sacrifice paid in fear of pain of loss, would offset as Protection from fear set in the frame of risk of future pain of loss.
Many tried to help them see that they did this even unto themselves, but nothing they said could be understood, but if only partly understood the messengers were attacked & drawn into pathological thinking or denied any voice or place.

Meanwhile their  Model of pathological biology mutated to weak and broken genetic coding as the cause for susceptibility for sickness and the genetic control complex set to remake biology to better serve its officially assigned functions, even though no such control was in fact controllable.

The last stand was in the discovery of bio-field operating upstream to presumed genetic controls. But as with germs, only insiders understood that the mainstreamed official narratives were more a way to control people that related to anything real, but in the guise of a saviour complex, they set to block life, transfect their own signalling and boost the failed genetic solution to the failed germ & virus solution, so that they would finally GET rid of the disease, even if they lost the patient.

What happened to them next?
Did they live happily ever after?
Knowing nothing?

How Real is 'our reality'?

in response to the themes in:

https://tessa.substack.com/p/john-stockwell-old-interview

 

 The question 'how real is our reality' is not asked by those who are 'asleep' in the wish, fear and belief it IS reality.

(To actually question reality would be a relational willingness to receive answer - not a private validation of strategic models of masking adaptation to social & environmental or structural dictates. But the 'It' of an objectified exclusion is already the breakdown of such an intimacy of being).

Questioning reality is a result of re-cognising - at some level - that wishes are misdirected, fears are NOT escaped or overcome and belief is an INSIDE job - that maintains a status of believability by mutual reinforcement. In this sense we 'make a world' that is then our personal and cultural relationship with a 'cast out' and denied Self.

A whole is centred in all its parts, and Reality is your gift, to give and receive of That You Are.

In seeking and finding an 'experience' of self-specialness is our way of 'forgetting' already whole - to seek it outside or apart  From a sense of what we are not, set in fear and lack, as a basis for getting or boosting self made in image - blind to its source-nature by the grasping at substitutions that cannot work, but can provide means for a covert identity to run within the entanglement of love in fear - and fear in love, as a mind of conflict. Love is whole by extension. As are You.

In a sense the script is written - and Answered, but we are each and together in our unfolding consciousness of experience - even if we think this limits or defines Life of Source-Nature - to seem a thing-in-itself, born to suffer and to die a life made meaningless.

Waking within the dream is not part of its script, but an 'awakening script' that runs as answer where the problem is believed to be. Covid reveals that the reaction of defence needs only a ruse, not a real threat, and a strategy of self-imaged control needs enemies lest defences fall away of themselves.

With our entanglement of victim & perpetrator - where each can shift to the other and back in an instant of righteous vengeance or misdirected attempts to get love or power for a mistaken sense of self - we meet choices. Some are false means to the same end and serve to protect from seeing or knowing the unwanted or that which we are as yet unwilling and unready to see. Others are a recondition of a true from a false outcome where a willingness of self-honesty comes to see only a false choice released for a restoration of true that aligns whole as unselfconscious presence extended through whatever we be and do.

Coming to clearly accept that we do not want what a lie seems to offer is like the addict releasing the mindset of the control & dependency to Let Life In. We may pass through conflict over and again, but keep something in back of mind as an exception. The exception to truth is the wish & belief that the illusion may yet offer what truth cannot. And yet in truth, giving is the means for having, while in illusion, getting SEEMS to get away with it, for a time that cannot but be fraught with fear of pain of loss.

So we are meeting our gift - even though we have learned or trained our mind to outsource creative to Other, to It, and to an 'alien will' that is not at Home but seeks to steal it from you.

Wherever you go - there you are. But which 'script' are we actively living out - the separative self-sense or the willingness to heal - that is Let Healing Be (revealed).

Nothing is as we think, but what we think can align with who and what we (already) are, or mask over and obfuscate. Heaven doesn't forbid any thought, but as a state of wholeness, is without conflict, and so the addiction to the 'dynamic' of conflict in the fascination of horror, holds us in a gaze of futility that - but for limited tolerance for pain - would never find release.

The application of insight to a world of social masking as if to leverage or impact a 'better' outcome is where good intentions mask for a desire to use insight or truth as a weapon or a marketing ploy in the script of (struggle for) possession and control.

Abide with the Life revealing Within, to allow a natural expression of an integrative act to come not of our own making. The 'uncarved block' represents a foundation - as does a virgin birth - at a level a manufactured self and reality cannot recognise or understand. But love is the nature of communication and relationship - no matter the distorting or corrupting effect of a substitute 'love' given identity, power and protection.

Abiding through the undoing or transforming of our beliefs

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2023/01/14/right-or-wrong-i-am-sticking-with-what-i-believe/

 

 

I share ‘a resonance with you’ as this communication of shared purpose.
Our persona is not an autonomous, nor independent consciousness.
But founded on such a wish and assumption.
Its operating beliefs are not conscious, but offer a threshold for release of masking filters back to consciousness of connected & awareness. Yet they are set by separation trauma – or the split of mind/self as the attempt to take on false responsibilities – while neglecting primary responsibility within a field of true inherence.
Hence the notion of the Prodigal (or Prometheus) as running off with a mistaken identity, or what we might now call ‘phished’ by imaged reality.
False Evidence Appearing Real may begin with a wish to be or see as you are not. As your OWN special creation of imaged thinking. Just a bit on the side. Adulterates the whole to generate a false currency set in symbols as IF self existing Powers.

Doubling down in the mask is often the initial response to ‘incoming or approaching light’. Boost the defences, cover your eyes and don’t listen to aught but reinforcements for the battle against destruction – of a masking control running as You.
The resort to the Lie of protection from feared truth is hardly a choice, and yet choosing NOT to accept truth effectively chooses self-denial under a sense of compelled self-protection that MUST be attributed to a coercion or violation of self/reality. IE; someone/something ELSE MUST be attacked and sacrificed to pay the price that keeps a Greater Fear at bay.

Others must lose –and die– that I (self-specialness) can ‘live’.
But who would save his self shall lose it.
For from those those who have not, more shall be taken, even the little that they have.
Nothing of what I write can be brought INTO a world of lies set as power to determine and define truth. But then it is not addressed to who you or anyone thinks to be, so much as who you are at heart, in the acceptance and alignment of purpose and desire, indeed devotion.

I cannot speak to the ‘dead’ but only the living because communication in truth is a living resonance and not a contract of exchange set in darkness as the ‘laws of sacrifice’.
Differentiation between the living and the dead – or the presence and the presentation, is a critical discernment for the release and reintegration back to our Created being – for we can not and do not create our self or life or being–but in image and concept given social reinforcement.
That our freedom to create can generate a masking cover story is also that of aligning our story to a true resonance and transparency of synchronicity or alignment of purpose at the heart – NOT at the level of image & form. This is simply outside our capacity to do, and the attempt to do ‘love’ must set blocking substitutions of self-consciousness blamed on our tools. We yield what we have made, thought & identified in to our being.
Be still (of conflicted self generated conflict-solution) to let the Knowing Field Be where you thought to become, and receive a shifted awareness of practical reintegration as you are currently willing and ready to accept.
Problem-based identity is bound to its ‘solutions’.
The breakdown of a masking ‘reality’ can open deep and thus intense conflicts that cannot be passed through without the cultivation of qualities that align to our being, such as trust, honesty, tolerance, gentleness, defencelessness. joy, generosity, patience, faithfulness, and open mindedness. But again – these are naturally brought forth from the simple willingness to heal – now. (not as a concept to weave an unhealed sense of self in would-be virtue).

The call to war clearly denies all the living qualities for the overriding need of self-defence.
But the call to joy, wholeness or indeed God, is the willingness of opening to receive answer to true need – not as framed by our thinking – which can be very wrong.

The counter to Desmet seemed to be that any psychological ‘understanding’ lets the guilty persist in evils, and undermines the ability to identify and thus FIGHT the evil, allowing IT to triumph under an ‘understanding’ that works a deeper evil because it masks as a messenger of love.

Well it is true that psychological thinking can reinforce distance & division as IF to understand a problem by making it ‘real’ for experts to then work on.
Psychic or felt insight and intuition is part of our responsibility for our own consciousness as our gift TO our relationships that are then experienced in the measure of our giving.

So the need to check or deny dis-integrity is real, but calls for conscious alignment of purpose.
If the call to war prevails, then we will seek and join in hate as virtue and hate to love as perceived weakness. That IS the essential reset of ‘darkness as the operating system’, and demonstrating to yourself that you WANT it operates as your Will – no matter that you give power to what you hate, to then define you in the terms you set.

Desmet clicked in the social mind as a relief at finding some basis of understanding for clearly insane dissociation in family, friends and society. That is an example of ‘mass identification’ as antidote to ‘hysteria’ or rising panic of disturbance within OUR mind. But as the division or factions to it reveal, there is a baby and a bathwater to ‘helpful ideas’.

Answer is not in ‘identified beliefs’ but in real relationship.
In that sense I am unconcerned to being right or wrong under shifting lights of our own thinking, but seek and find a ‘rightmindedness’ (as distinct from a dissociative mindset) that is open to wholeness, rather than spinning in the joy of its own pain set special.

Looking ‘out’ at our world needs be also looking within at our participation. Those who live the screen ‘reality’ as exclusive must do & die as the projection dictates. IT says you are a result of random or meaningless material processes, such as to be inherently bio-insecure. This is fear of death – or rather fear of life set in fear of yielding a sense of possession and control taken in vain.
That is taken out from the Context that is Meaning, as if to play the idol, & take the ride it gives.

 

How do we know?

 in response to the themes in:

https://tessa.substack.com/p/epistemology

Truth is revealed by the release or undoing of concealment - which is in our minds.
If we give or yield our own thought to truth - or what is - we no longer filter through a presumption of knowledge taken in vain or self-imaged reality.
So much is filtered by the self-image as a self or thing in itself.
Infinity is filtered & masked by our presumption to know - by virtue of giving focus to self in image - or what we usually mean by 'thinking'.
How is coherence felt?
How is resonance felt?
How do you know what is aligned with who and what you are?
By the Word there was light and it was very good!
The word that we give can be out of alignment with the Word that created us whole.
Such that we know not what we do - but be-live the conflict of our own Projection.
But there is no conflict in God - even if we think to Project our conflict onto God and be-live the result.
Be still, and know.
That is release the conflict as your word and receive a true Word by which to guide & heal your mind.
Or persist in 'your own way' as if you can do what love has always already given. This usurps the true movement of being for an augmented 'reality' experience that thinks to become autonomous but is trapped by its own self-conflict such as to replicate archetypal patterns of 'Separation trauma' by the very attempt to escape, overcome or heal it.
separation trauma is undone by letting love - the movement of being - move directly through where you thought you were - a thing of or unto itself.