I see a spiked agenda running on mis-sold 'thescience'

in response to the themes in:

 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mike-yeadon-on-the-toxicities-deliberately-designed-into-the-covid-vaccines/

 

 

I lean to a sense that a philanthropathic bent and bought science is used to set 'risk modelling' as if fact - so as to initiate popular demand for protections and use that to gain regulatory capture or control function by stealth through 'thescience' set in faith given protected or securitised narratives - that we are trained and framed to think in.

Instead of observing life we fund a lot of in vitro, animal/insect and now in silico attempts to reverse engineer for predictive control - ostensibly for 'the betterment of all mankind' - its progress innit!

So biomarkers set into elitist models running on such narratives operate in place of an actual empirical assay.

EVERYTHING is being quantified to run as code entities in a technocracy.

Life is then sacrificed or discarded for the Model that 'Makes us safe!' (Too Big To Fail - sic)

A modern version of 'Idol'

How much of genetics is in fact dogma? The replacement of a true genesis offers all the gain of function set in false inheritances.

We stand on the shoulders of giant mistakes.

I see a spiked agenda running on mis-sold 'thescience' where toxic debt/consequence is outsourced (dumped) onto the body politic.

The simplest science on this that pertains may be the fundamental nature of zeta potential as the vitality of functional capacity and adaptive resilience that is undermined or weakened by toxic shock - and persistent toxic shock burden.

The 'tares' run a terminator script - initiating the harvest of a true discernment under conditions of compression by which the inessential is released. Call it 'wicked' if you want, but to divest you self of it - not to feed a guilting or gaslighting agenda.