Unclear Weapons - Terror Threat or Mind Manipulation?

Unclear Weapons - Terror Threat or Mind Manipulation? 

 

Tom Cowan offered an overview of reasons to be sceptical of the claims of atomic weapons - particularly the two that were claimed to have destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/U7Op8BkoT1hT/

I was already aware of this but interested to see if there were further information - but also as part of willingness to openly question the questionable- when locked behind securitised secrecy, and carrying many anomalous accounts.

I felt to offer the following as a linked example of bent bought science regarding radiation - that I have mentioned before.

https://hps.org/hpspublications/historylnt/episodeguide.html

This series of video segments (ignore the intro & outro to optimise attention) is a very worthy example of a trail of bent and bought science that began in a race for a Nobel in proving evolution by experimenting with radiation on fruit flies (Ie why not start with a minimal exposure of 100 million times background radiation for the lower dose cohort.

False positives were later retracted but a model of linear no threshhold risk was established (& from then on protected). This runs the closed mechanical system of assumption that genetic damage was cumulative regardless dose and irreversible. But regardless the discovering of genetic repair and even adaptive resilience, the model was philanthropically protected in later developments of the use of a genetic vector that switched to from evolution to carcinogenic risks - running on the LNT modelling.

Among documentation shown by Dr Edward Calabrese is the reports of the 25 year study of Hiroshima & Nagasaki survivors that did not show support for the radioactive poisoning projections (though didn't question the actual event),

The whole thing is a worthy example of how science is bent to set false models by which then hype risks as a means to garner public support for regulatory capture that was in any case intended.

Calabrese presents to a scientific audience in that he understates his case and couches everything unemotionally, but I recommend anyone who actually seeks to learn by recognising the pattern of relationships that constitute a false narrative, as part of their own integrative renewal & release to life in true & free appreciation - would benefit from giving attention here.

I note the full interview on this site - but the youtube channel for it only has the earlier and less contentious segments of the interview. There are other interviews with calabrese, but this one sought to show the whole timeline.

The use of science to set risk by which to justify overriding powers is part of its 'DNA' that is - predictive control of technologically driven 'solutions' for what are truly relational conflicts - with inner and outer facets.