The Forgotten Side of Medicine |
You've hit the nail on the head, and that is a large part of why I am trying to make people aware of this.
The proclivity to seek 'external' solutions for inner relational conflicts drives both the 'victims' and the 'quack' of the wish to gain status and captive revenue stream as the provider of solutions - protected and directed by regulatory capture and control.
The latter has become so disproportionate as to have become global regulatory capture of a broad spectrum dominance, over a captive population of groomed dependency.
The principle means of this in the usurping of medical service has been philanthropathy - not merely the more well known Rockefeller takeover of primary institutions to allopathic pharma based control systems, but the insider protection of dogma that the system runs on, namely the western bio-medical model, with regard to its almost exclusive focus on external causations for a classifiction of diseases assigned to its own bestiary of definitions, tests or biomarkers, interventions or treatment protocols, and further definition or framing of results as the development of disease, rather than disease of treatment.
Germ theory is recognisable dogma in that it runs as a protected or securitised narrative - along with it primary corollory; vaccinations.
Likewise cell theory - see Harold Hillman and Gilbert Ling.
Genetics is the tech that rules them all and in the darkness binds them, as it is the claim, and enforcement of a physical determinism wielded by elitist philanthropaths, as the capture of the defining of the underpinnings of life in such a way as to create and control predictive risk modelling set into media hype to drive the popular support or even demand for the 'treatments' and 'solutions' that the modelling and definitions are patently intended to deliver.
The mass mind is weaned from a family & community based self-sufficiency, to a corporately managed and groomed dependency on externally provided substitutions for life, for relational endeavour and growth of consciousness, so as to instead grow or adapt the unconsciousness of ever deeper abnegation of their living will, to a blind control system running a masked identity under promise to make you safe.
When inner conflicts are denied, evaded and masked over by investing in a panacea, the psychic elements of the issue have not gone away, but will manifest through the new arena without recognition, so as to set a pattern of masking defences and evasions that ripen to crisis of a fundamental decision; release the underlying beliefs that set the pattern of a self-evasion and open self-responsibility at the level of self-integrity that is within reach, or release the will to live as acquiescence to death in life and death instead of life.
When pain physical, mental and emotional is overwhelming, the ability to regain a grounded sense of one's being is blocked, so there is a time and place for suppression of symptoms within an active desire to heal. But healing has no (official) place in the western monopoly model. The ego (problem) is to be protected even unto sickness and death by treatment set in risk-models based on bent science. On false or partial definitions given exclusive priority, as the technologism of biology to a system it is now being fitted, conformed, sacrificed.
The hard work is hard because it is a real relationship that will meet the resistance of dogmatically invested identity in doctor and in patient.
Healing arises -as can be accepted - in the context of a real relationship.
Western biology suffers with science generally from overreaction against 'vitalism', psychism, religious and mythic cultural adaptations and spiritual integrity.
The blocked, denied and often demonised realm of our inner conscious experience and responsibility meets the 'devil' of a subjection to experience of powerlessness to chemical, & biotech controls set by 'caring' malice.
BUT - we are free to choose our own path and live our choices for our own reasons as our own experience. Even if such is choosing not to question societal defaults that lead into sickness and suffering. But while we can think, we have choice as to what we accept into our mind by acting from it. Even if a new habit takes persistence over time to release the old.
in response to the themes in:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-decades-of-evidence-that-antidepressants/
I have worked in the life insurance industry most of my career and have done a lot of field underwriting. SSRIs are prescribed like candy. No follow ups. No talk therapy. It is rather alarming. But a lot of people look for shortcuts because they don’t want to do the hard work. This applies to both medical professionals and patients, IMHO.