Masking Reality

 Mike Stone's ViroLIElegy site prompted some responses to its themes.

https://viroliegy.com/2022/05/10/direct-template-and-the-theoretical-structure-of-antibodies-1930-1940/

1. 

don’t mean to be dismissive of the journey into complexity but I see that our minds create theories to replace or mask a ‘Theos’ or Divine Will that ‘moves across the face of the waters’.
I relate this to the self-organising of plasma – which is in effect the electrical/magnetic force as the primary expression of both matter & life, at all scales – not just atomic.
Self-organising or self-sustaining systems are expression of their terrain and never actually ‘separate’ but express boundary conditions within Communication as individuated expressions of the whole.
Our psychic sense of separation as an autonomous entity set apart from its living context, speaks of trauma that ‘shapes’ our thought, perceptions and response to project or externalise a pathology as an attempt to work it out in image, in model and theory for application as ‘control’ which is the mind-substitution for Communication as what we might call Bio-Field communion.
I sketch this out in case anyone resonates and enjoys the connection.
The principle of alignment in spirit or unified purpose, is a release of obstrauctive and obfuscating conflicts or toxic debts from restored clarity of a functional awareness – such as joyful endeavour.
Life is designed (unfolded meaning) to be lived. Including the ‘be-living of false or wishful vanities that generate ‘lessons’ for both correction and expansion.

 

2.

Gain of fiction serves the usurp of function. Temporarily.
I hear Tom saying there is no concrete evidence that these theories are true or work in the way they are said to work. But they are the output of highly focussed investments, and attract more investment, to participate in medical or biological memes given social dominance, such as gene dogma.
What does this evidence tell us about the mind we participate in?

We have a freedom to be-live ideas that are not true of reality, and experience their result as a filtered and distorted or blocked reality. But this is self-limiting by definition, and by resulting dissonance, dysfunction, conflict, disease & death.

We therefore have a capacity to learn as an unfolding consciousness of multiple perspectives in balance and alignment with reality that supports & life as the discernment and participance in reality that cannot be objected – except in concept as a symbolic gesture or casting out.
Sow and reap, or GIGO.

I paused during writing this, to share a morning reading – which speaks exactly to these points and the underlying confusions and fallacies that generated a need for healing. It isn’t within the scientific paradigm of a physical self-self assembly requiring control, but is open to reproducibility of intention & desire for coherent experience: Healing as Release from Fear
https://www.christmind.info/t/acim/text/02/chap0202/

I’m not promoting beliefs, but bringing attention to the field of contextual framing that sets, limits and unfolds beliefs. That we may suffer at our own hand, unwittingly. Such as to react to false information & reap negative results assigned to something other than pre-existing assumptions that can be recognised and released because they are being brought to awareness.

 

 

3.

‘Sinister’ can be the intent to block knowledge by the setting of complex defences that induce an attraction to conflict in evil, as if understanding must be wrested from lies!
If something is revealed false, it serves no basis from which to build or think from.
If we find we persist in a false habit of thought, then that shows us that we think it gives us something we believe we need or cannot live without. That evidence now leads curiosity to uncover another facet of a ‘complex defence’ to a reality test, or self-honesty.
Getting identity from hated or feared evils is, in my view, the misuse of a stepping stone, as a conclusion.

 

4.

In terms of principles, the breakdown of organisational structure ie 'cells' or functional energy-informational domains within a larger terrain (domain), will resolve to recycle or elimination as both a material energy function & the deeper or subtler psychic or 'consciousness' field that is more informational as a qualitative vibrational domain - from which and in which patterning grows form as function.
So in old paradigm-speak, there is information accompanying 'presumed particles' that holds resonant capacities of communication at a level of life we cannot dissociate from to objectify and map our mind into 'control' over.
There is an intent that guides & aligns the organisation or order we are 'mapped into' as World.
This statement is not adding anything to the 'physics' so much as acknowledging the qualitative recognition of communication as the field of resonant domains within a vibrational or charged energetic experience of existence.
It is the function of mind to extend or give & receive meaning. Nothing has in-built meaning. But conditioned responses SEEM autonomous within a time-space continuum.
Object continuity is part of learning the focus of a human world. Mapping out meanings is a cultural overlay to a relational interplay of infinite complexity. Beneath the ritual languages of any 'official domain' run the core archetypal themes or patterns of the human conditioning.

From this perspective, we might seek to align in meanings of coherency and fidelity to an integrity of being, rather than to old maps and models in which we may be subconsciously investing 'identity' - or masking in unwittingly.
Pathological biology is in my view, a projection of our 'broken psyche' or separation trauma, onto our relational (experience of) body & world.
The NEED for 'enemy' can generate its perception-response regardless of any empirical or relational situation. We cant tell another what their experience of reality is or should be. Nor vice versa. But we can find the conditions that grow and support a wholeness  in life, rather than lockdown to fear set tyrannous in the minds stamped by their currently accepted past.