Let love replace fear - the mind will align to serve rather than run a head

 Let love replace fear - the mind will align to serve rather than run a head

 in response to the themes in:

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a 

My reply below was sparked by the following comment:

@ColeFalon

Dr Bailey,

One of the big reasons why you "still get questioned with" whataboutisms is that humans' brains "need" stories/explanations for their experiences. It is too much to ask that individuals allow for a vacancy in causal explanations, which is essentially what you are doing. While that works just fine for some of us (myself included), most people will simply not reject an unsupported belief UNLESS a new/alternative belief take its place.

To put it another way, while you have done an amazing job of illustrating how unsubstantiated this mainstream belief is, you haven't yet offered people an acceptable replacement belief. (And yes, I realize that you, and many others in the comments, HAVE actually given bits of alternative explanatory components. I just don't think they are complete enough as a "story" to fill the potential vacancy that would arise if one discards the previous mainstream narrative.) In order for people to give up a narrative, an equal or greater narrative must take its place.

Germ theory (and more so, Viruses themselves) makes such a great story for people because A) It provides a clear mono-causal explanation, and B) It makes a "villain" that can be blamed. (The external locus of control here is quite unfortunate.)

Trust me, the moment you put together a sufficiently strong MONO-CAUSAL "story/explanation" to replace this current mainstream one...it will take off like wildfire. (Unfortunately, there might not be a mono-causal story. And sadly this presents some challenges to human thinking.)

Don't be surprised when very few are able to accept that a long held belief (that they have taken on faith) is actually unsupported and invalid. There is simply too much cognitive disruption for most people to handle.

I thank you for what you are doing. It is incredible.

Cole

 

The psycho-physical nature of existence is the terrain that your questioning infers, and  this is already a split mind of masked inner conflicts that are projected out rather than faced, owned, resolved or healed.
So the pathogenic principle is the projection of unhealed conflict to external associations such as to 'escape' a feared or hated cause within our own mind, by distancing & attacking it in something or someone 'other'.
The triggering of such traumatic or 'survival' conditioning is felt as loss of control, loss of face, loss of self-validity, but is all variants to lack of love. True understanding is a perspective of love and appreciation, but is usurped pathologically to mean 'control'. An invested ID in control runs covert, as if keeping us safe, but it is keeping the underlying cause hidden as protection against knowing what you sought to put out of your own awareness to adapt and survive a sense of self & world as conflict. This is the assigned function of a mind unwilling or unready to accept reality as it is, and thus in conflict with itself, but focused to mask that out so as to get for or get away from a sense of lack of wholeness - lack of love.
There is a single cause of pathological thinking, but its shadows or expressions in a world overmasked with projection are fragmented, multi-levelled and insanely complex - but nonethe less traceable by signature characteristics back to the fallacy or contradictory thinking they represent.
A mind given to possession and control, attempt to defend against a like response as if what it thinks to take for itself will now be taken back, or exposed and suffer retribution. Lies fear exposure, and invoke an ingenious defence to buy time against loss of face etc. To add another layer, we socially mask in mutually reinforcing definitions as tacit agreements such as to collectively support such distancing from a true intimacy of natural presence as 'exposure to lack or shame' and thus social exclusion.