GoF or Acceptance of True Function?

https://tessa.substack.com/p/dangerous-disinformation-come-science/

 

 Psyop or deceit frames the basis for all war, hence the saying "truth is the first casualty of war". There is no truth in its framing.

Reading of historical context such as Koch's criminal tuberculin fraud and subsequent hiring and protection by his government for using the false theory as a psyop to deny ports to ships supplying the then enemy, Britain, I see the underlying principle for virology as gain of function research - that is the whole field is  a coded reworking of body function such as healing phase from toxic shock and malnutrition - into a pathogenic frame of control.

 So taxing or cultivating sickness as a protected fear narrative that is itself, sown, nurtured and protected as a securitised narrative that absolutely divides those who knowing operate such a control system from those who are fed such a matrix of false solutions designed to reinforce their dependency while in effect stealing life energy by deceit.

Proof of claim is on those who make it. I don't have to demonstrate that our living biology is without any pathological intent, but the persistence of any narrative belief and practical application of such belief where claims have been found to be unsupported reveals a securitised denial of open communication or protected lie.

Consider that a practical definition of sin is where invested self-illusion is used as a basis for active attack and undermining of truth. The nature of self-illusion is then a propensity for being phished by our own thinking - which is always in a relational context, such that what we take to be our own thinking can in fact be running as an automatic function set in habits of defence that protects us from exposure to unresolved or masked conflicts that nevertheless remain active in the 'system' if no longer perceived within a bubble of control, set in narratives by which the masking of such a temporary expedience becomes an auto defence mechanism set in hidden rules and filters under the invocation of safety by partition or division and fragmentation, rather then a true resolution, in which the fear and its defences or armouring becomes redundant.

The nature of perception has come to be accepted as reality, and yet it is always an interpretative filtering of a mind set in division, except when yielded to active willingness for healing, in which all that serves awakened purpose is brought in witness, while all that is meaningless is either redeemed to terms of recognisable or practical love, or no longer applicable as a GoF script for hate, grievance and attack given love or priority as basis for self made on mis taken experience of lack set in fear of pain of loss.

Awareness is not physical, even if embodiment in thought expressed the full spectrum of tangibility and visibility. Lockdown and distancing to the 'physical' is actually a disembodied machine thinking operating as fear of Self, Life and Reality, when the body or thing as object, form or thing is used as symbol for masking, distancing and attacking a reality that does not support self image given love and power.

Reality in expression is Function in which we have integrality.
But a partiality of focus within wholeness sets to gain support and protection for a temporal subset or distortion of All That Is. When we know we are in imaginary construct as a parallel model of predictive or prophetic reading, we can see if it serves true desire. But in mistaking the reflections as truth, we are in a sense phished by desire set within its framing, such as to become possessed by a grasp rising from fear of loss. Conditional love generates loss of functional or feeling awareness in exchange for a gain of function set as a world of and for Getting. The nature of true receiving is for giving. Where giving and receiving are one, a true participance and presence replaces the basis for struggle under threat with a more integrative perception regardless the conditions of a fear defined adaptation or conditioning.

Relational awareness is then the basis from which to discern rather than judge as division.
Restoring true function to wholeness of being is then the release of blocks to awareness of love in action or joy in being. When ego seeks to replicate for Spirit, it masks in hollow symbolic representations seeking reinforcement. Unconscious is not a psychic dustbin of psychopathy but the wellspring of unselfconscious joy, but having denied both love and fear as threat, we cofuse each with the other, and so opening our psychic or felt awareness can result in traumatic or psychotic 'ego-alien' encounters without the guidance and support of 'Spirit' that is syncronous with willingness for acceptance of healing as a basis for trust, honesty, and consistency of freely shared appreciation.

I have used a quote often in the last two years because it not only has social relevance but is an inalienable gift of our being to question anything that frames us in lack, inadequacy or shame seeking cover; "And WHO told you you were naked?" said the Lord.

What function would you seek to gain if all that you truly are is already given in your creation as the unique expression of an unfolding appreciation of wholeness extended?
Losing awareness generates dis-synchrony or dissonances of noise to signal. Seeking for meaning in the shadows SEEMS to make meanings unlike the love that means you.
Regardless ultimate reality, you will find what you are looking for, as your own creative freedom. Hence to know your purpose is to recognise it in your fruits or current experience. In this sense a conflicted feedback can serve a true enquiry instead of a GoF dark Op.