The Novel Means for Determining a Construct as a Discovery

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/06/the-real-conspirators-who-lied-about.html

Are you informed as to the non physical means for determining the discovery of a virus or indeed new virus?

The mainstream presumption is that they find a thing and then sequence it. They never find nor have they found a thing or isolated characterisable thing nor have they demonstrated causation of disease unique, specific or otherwise.

They have take samples from one to nine clinical cases of respiratory disease, run such filtering as to refine only the finer particles in the range of presumed viruses but which are still an indeterminate mass of cell debris that are assayed as millions of very short sequences of RNA. Never the whole virus. The software of computer modelling can run to 'realign' these humpty dumpty samples so as to reconstruct whet the virus would have been before breaking up. There are references to other known virus definitions in this process of 'reverse engineering and filling in the gaps. But the other definitions are also derived from the same techniques. As can be expected, the software parameters and samples chosen can output innumerable variants, but more importantly the testing set up by Drostren is based on primers taken from this 'novel determination that have no relevance to any disease inducing agent regardless other parameters of the PCR can be set to produce expedient results.

The formulation of the S-protein for injecting as genetic manipulation may well be where GoF operates, with the 'discovery' of virus and testing then created as the prequel to the novel synthetic protein. If gene therapy is not a huge investment bubble of captured identity and actually works as sold. For another weaponised narrative to be substantiated is the injection of nanoparticular robotics such as to interface with devices and field technology in terms of transhuman or biotech convergence.

We would be well cautioned to pause before ANY narrative runs our thinking as to whether is has true substance and foundation in life and empirical veracity or is effective running as reaction to fears operating as beliefs or wishes of gain set in solving such beliefs or manipulating such beliefs.

It is well known in war that the perception and belief in a greatly superior opposition or overwhelming threat will demoralises and defeat an enemy without ever coming to battle.

I am suggesting here that the contagious virus belief is an ongoing and protected or securitised narrative maintained for hidden control of populace by trojan means, and is a key facet of a PPP in which all public office and trust is effectively captured by a financial and corporate sector.

Bioweapons as toxins that undermine the body's checks and balance to detox and regenerate, are ubiquitous pollutants and exposures that are diverted from by the contagion cover story.

As with Climate fear, Virus fear left all reason to focus on the undermining, limiting and demonisation of Life on Earth by which to institute broad spectrum systemic controls as a technocracy of an essentially split humanity into owners and bio-assets. Yet many would be owners are no less captured assets.

Dr Stefan Lanka ran a control recently that shows CPE (cytopathic effect) occurs regardless of the introduction of so called 'viral isolates'. It being an artefact of the preparation of cell cultures as the testbed for 'infectivity', including starvation and toxification of the cells. Healthy cells could not be 'infected' and so malnutrition and antibiotics prepare ye the way of the virus!

As well as Lanka, Dr Andre Kaufman and Dr Tom Cowan both offer followable understanding of the principles as I have sketched out here. This is not an opinionated identity position of further divergence, but a point of relational and empirical coherence.

There is a deeper layer of psychic or psychological defence that all of this represents, but the anthropomorphic liability of the mind is its projection of its own narratives to its perceived interpretation, taken as reality in place of a current and present relational honesty or indeed innocence.