Covid Narrative Illusions

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/21/covids-ifr-just-keeps-dropping/

#1

I would invite a much more specific consideration.

What ‘covid’ infection rate?

Is this a meaningful result of any meaningful analysis of meaningful data or the sliding parameters of ‘cases’ established via all kinds of variable procedures that don’t mean anything?

In terms of the presentation I read this much; the impositions are ratcheting up without any pretence to real threat – hence a ‘community support’ of the mind captured and incentivised compliant, gives the basis for restructuring / destructuring social and economic – and biological functionality and coherence.

#2

When invested self illusion is protected, truth becomes framed as a feared exposure.

The attack on truth for the protection of lies is what ‘sin’ meant.

It sacrifices the living to feed a dead idol.

Its wage or result is spiritual death and within such a denial is a world of death experienced as war against truth. Or rather, against truth blocked by its own projected motives and intent.

The body is used as a distancing, symbol of contraction from relational communication by a split off or dissociated sense of mind that is set in knowing not what its does – aka under denial. The body’s limit, frailty and sickness are all serving to mask from Self-Awareness, such as to serve a narrative identity of Self-evasion.

Sartre observed correctly that the mind’s recoil from truth generates self-illusion that operates mechanically or reactively to conditions that reiterate the meanings or definitions locked in by fear and its denial. There are other ways to see than through the mind of fear, but one cannot release what is actively disowned and masked over by default.

I simply see ‘covid’ as one a a selection of securitised and protected narratives relative to official purvey and sanction. IE – removed from freedom to publicly discuss (and retain any social position of influence).

Faith given to false and destructive narrative dictates is indeed faithless or bad faith.

No matter how opaque the mask, there is a human spark within. This is not about our personality level. Nor about sympathy. But we all have facets of ourself that are deeply denied, and also meet people who are in deep denial.

Release and be released is a spiritual recognition.

I have faith that truth cannot be forever denied and so all self-illusion shall be revealed and undone in its time and timing – which I see as a matter of willingness, not circumstance.

#3

You miss the BBC point, it doesn’t matter if they are caught in the lie, the idea is to get it out there, repeat, repeat etc..then the ” facts” prove otherwise, but it no longer matters the poison is already disseminated and most people don’t bother to ask

Voila, BBC goal achieved, its ” highly likely”

Yes by framing the narrative, the dissenter will generally be used to reinforce it.

This is why I feel not to accept, run or propagate weaponised language – unless in a context that clearly reveals its misuse.

The mechanism assigned to viruses is extremely evident in human minds.

#4

Frieda Vizel

This is different. To believe most lies, all people had to do was not pay too much attention. Covid demanded intense attention and sacrifice. People’s worlds were upended in a way quiet apart from anything in recent memory. And most weren’t drafted by force or swept up in hype. They volunteered, and volunteered for it for over a year now.

The investments were already held, and were summoned or called in by the established order. So the idea I am sketching is that if you stand in a false foundation, when it is edited or manipulated, you have NO basis but to change with it – excepting to release what seemed your self and world to the intuition of Life against all appearances or past assumptions.

The latter is what is occurring step by step in those who could not abide or accept the open dictate of fear.

We all ‘volunteered’ for the human experience by the persistence of the focus by which we have come to living it now. Obviously not as a verbal mental consent, but at a vibrational level, consent is not what we say, but what we give or withhold of our self.

The capacity to doubt and override our own experience is part of the survival masking that fits in. We are social beings. Uncovering and living our own authority is nothing to do with the ego of reaction. Look to Jesus – or anyone else who extends a true witness without fear or favour.

Focusing on what they did or did not do cannot be free of what we ourselves do or don’t do. Under threat, most will feel for how to respond by the acts or not of those they consider more authorised. When no one in any institutional establishment speaks out, almost all voices are silenced. For if they are too fearful to speak – what must they know that frightens them so? Or what are they in support of, that is being carried out under pretext of making you safe?

A lot do not want to look at things that are out of their depth and beyond their sense of capacity to do anything about – while a sense of extreme exposure to pain and loss is associated with anything they may feel could be obliged of them if they let themselves see. And so without even thinking, this risk level is maintained as a strategy of personal survival in a world they adapt to survive – which for many includes consuming diversion, reinforcing their mask, numbing the pain, and attuning to their source of news and direction.

However, to presume some process of observation and awareness is not active at a deeper level would be mistaken. I actually hold an opposite view to your opening; All we need to remain free of lies is not give attention. During the first few weeks I did not let my attention dwell in any of it. Only when it became obvious the bait had been taken did I then choose to take my own education in not just what is presented but the whole psycho-physical bandwagon effect – and the opportunity for an education and awakening that all deceits offer.

#5

You have to prove SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, biochemically characterised and shown to cause disease first. Then once you have achieved that, prove it is infectious. None of these steps have been fulfilled, so talk of long-term side-effects are wholly irrelevant.

Yes I agree – but if the results of ‘treatments’, deprivations, stresses, masking and Nuv@x™ along with any other candidate can be flagged as ‘long covid’, then the novel can be extended with further chapters.

I also wait on sound evidence for truth of any of this covert identity theft. So I need not engage in its narrative assertions but have to be aware of the reactions that have been leveraged or provoked by incitement to hysteria, and a significant element of social support from ‘left’ and ‘green’.

#6

Loverat

A 99.85% chance of survival without the gene therapy ‘vaccine’.

I wonder what it is with it. I’m seriously wondering if is above 50%. Watching various well respected figures come out about pathogenic priming and other scenarios, the German lawyer, Vernon Coleman, Mike Yeadon etc I do worry.

Why would anyone (aside from possibly the vulnerable groups) even give consideration to it. That’s aside from the risk they are deliberately trying to bump us all off.

I write to the theme - so this is partly responding to 'pathogenic scenarios' bit is not a personal reply.

If you ONLY look within the frame of mortal fear you are effectively locked down in a mind that distances you from other perspectives under a masking narrative/persona.

The outer form of this covid looked at directly is much ado about nothing.

An ants nest has been stirred up by narratives of dissociating fear, and reinforced and locked in by narratives of guilt. The idea of 'build back better' is simply an intent to channel and direct fear, as 'solutions' or defences, that direct and redistribute funding and control - as 'permissioned' by narrative edicts as top down rules induced in the population as social virtue masking over personal survival and social standing.

So fear and guilt set the underlying framework or operating system that all kinds of compartmentalised logic then operates according to the predicates and parameters of the model, worldview or assumed and invested identity.

The perspective on fear and guilt that heals or undoes, rather than reinforces it, is from an awareness that embraces the activity of psychic intent and emotional reaction. This is invited by desisting from investment in identity struggle in its terms, and so watching the mind rather than reactively identifying in thoughts and feelings. Especially when tempted to react in ways that undermine our fundamental trust in self and life.

A parable that came to my mind is of Satan v Job as the witness to human freewill, rather than robotic creatures or programs running blind or will-less.

Satan's role was to seek every and any way to undermine Job's living faith.

Job's fate is to live through experience of persecution and loss to open an Intimacy of being through his own free willing. Satan represents love locked down and masked in image and form as possession and control. Job represents the Spirit and Potential of Man (Humankind) as free alignment in shared will and shared Creation.

The Choice in any and every moment is fear or love, illusion or truth. Conflict or connected peace. BUT illusions may be associated with fear-protections and masking virtues, and Truth with exposure to masked fears that honesty and trust will result in sacrifice, pain and loss.

The mind that set and masked in self-illusion is not a reliable guide for decision as it generates the mask of dissociation to persist as Your guide and 'protection'. Who then are You? Be still and know.

There's a saying, "don't let truth get in the way of a good story". What makes it 'good'? Privately driven self interest, or shared life?

It may seem as if private self interest is set in, as, or under evil, because it generates such polarised and polarising conflicts of ignorance and arrogance. The reintegration of a personal will to a Universal Desire is an undoing of a false foundation, not its destruction. But invested self-illusion will frame truth as destructive, and emulate this as the basis for its own private creations.

If we knew what we do, we would not be freely willing to persist it.

Hiding from ourself is part of maintaining our self/world.

When we bring this to awareness, the self/world changes.

But while we bring a framed awareness to the self/world we reinforce it in all we think, say and do. The choice can seem to be between fear of pain of loss, and death. Many choose to die to escape an intolerable conflict. In life as unconsciousness, or as an ending of life in death. Because freedom is of the Mind, the mind can limit itself in a body or complex of thought. But CAN your thoughts trap you or truly become an 'alien will'?