The right to hold beliefs - and change them

  https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/01/06/latest-news-246/#comment-339075 

Beliefs are of course an inviolable right and whatever you choose to believe brings the fruits or results by which you can if you choose revaluate the predicates and bring a different outcome.

Current working models or beliefs can be seen AS modelling and not confused with Fact - which simply is the case regardless any 'war in the human mind' as to claim to establish truth.

If I trust that truth will reveal itself to a simple willingness to learn, then everything becomes at some level feedback from which to discern and align in truth.

The current global situation has within it a very strong emotional conflict that carries the desire to lid or mask over the disturbance of such conflict for a less fearful sense of existence. This reaction is known to provide the opportunity to offer 'solutions' that serve the intent to control outcomes.

This goes back to setting fear into animals to herd them to a cliff edge or staked out trap.

Or to unsettling an adversary so as to take advantage of their confusion to guide or coerce them to your own preferred agenda. There is nothing in such statements that is not readily observable in human behaviour - indeed in our own thought.

The stated intention of tax paid disinfo agents acting online is to introduce division and doubt in a targeted 'enemy of the State' so as to undermine their capacity to act or even become a movement that could act. Sowing fear and division is stated as part of the Gov Nudge unit's guidance for establishing obedience by ramping up fear and inducing public shaming. I haven't begun to address the PPP (Public Private Partnership) regulatory model that has replaced Government, Media, and other public service institutions under what is easiest to describe as a cartel monopolism - of which Banking holds the reins or choke points as the control of accepted currency of worth or value.

A legitimate criticism of so called 'conspiracy theorists' is when fear and distrust feeds upon an evil or hateful imagination to lose all grounding and power of responsibility to a Them. But pause if you will for a moment to consider that all our national security, defence and medical 'defences' are set in fear and distrust of 'enemies or threats to an ongoing role OF such controls - which includes deep decisions as to the organisation and freedom of association, information and decision-making that of course can all stack up to protect the fearful from their own disclosure.

I sought to put this without invoking blame or shame, but rather to identify human beliefs and behaviours that are characteristically in us all at some level and in different ways.

When I write I can often be misunderstood and misjudged as a result of not fitting into or supporting a 'side' or seeming to be relevant to a 'war'. But the war is using our own minds to invoke polarised identity that is then invested in and supporting of conflict and division as a way of saving from or winning against the particular image and form of the threat or enemy we each perceive as the 'problem'.

I didn't follow the conversation you relate to but I appreciate your willingness to return as a willingness to communicate your position rather than to leave something in terms that you recognised were not true or worthy of maintaining.

The phrase 'truth will out' is the corollary of illusions (or indeed lies) are temporary. Protected illusions can persist as long as there is willingness to sacrifice truth to their increasing demands. I see this an an increasing subjection to 'control agenda' or machine-thinking. There is no love in it - for all its masking in terms of 'care and concern'. There is no joy in it - for all its ritualised glamour or media spin. There is no peace in it and in this sense I don't just mean in the world of transience and change, but in our hearts, our families and relational endeavours.

How to reach a mind 'locked down and masked over' in defended beliefs

Perhaps first to accept another where they are as a basis for what may reveal itself in a free willingness. Anti-agendas are made in the image of their 'enemy', this is a form of being conditioned to a normalised dissociation by our own choices.

I have to accept that everyone acts in what at that moment they define and perceive to be their best interests. But that acting from mistaken or dissociated fears runs as garbage in; garbage out. Otherwise we would have no feedback for error correction, but would be convicted of our own illusions without any means of waking from the nightmare.

And WHO told you you were naked? - said the Lord' - says to me that we are innately Given the means to question our experience - which is always a RESULT and not Fact.

Subjective experience is already a virtual representation of Reality and now we are generating a virtual displacement and contraction to a further level of dissociation.

If you are offered coercively framed deceit and choose not to accept it, you may be seen as hard core denialism, obstacle or opposition and threat by those who have accepted or consented to its terms and conditions as their invested belief.

I feel that if we really mean to choose Life, we have to resist the temptation to react in like kind to the dumping of guilt by our accusers - or else we join them in what we say we hate and become the hippocrite they will immediately identify as justification for theirs.

Personally I see a much bigger issue that the ‘great reset’ - and part of this is the attempt of the ego to pre-empt and usur Life for its own ‘survival’ as a sense of private control over Life. In the light of our giving  setting the measure of our receiving, how could this NOT result in lockdown, conflcit and paralysis in ‘hell’ of a convicted hate without escape? There is a Higher Order Event than the attempt to ‘control’ it.

This is always true. But when truth shall come out is when the game is no longer worth the candle. This is an invidual choice and we are all part of each other and so it is a movement of a new way of seeing in the whole - and the old habit seeks to reset the old normal under a redistribution of guilt and fear - by narrative deveopments that add to the problem by repackaging the toxic conflcit into complex evasions. That is what its is and does; a complex of Self-evasions where false premises follow false profits.

#2

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/01/06/latest-news-246/#comment-339082

Your closing comment gave rise to a knowledge that political process can be distorted by what Ted Heath called 'all the usual means'.

We only see the behaviours of people who appear mad. We don't walk in their shoes.

There are all kinds of coercive factors - real or contrived - that can induce people to act against their own and others Good, under some sense of a lesser evil - which may also be lubricated. We only see the frontside or face.

If you had a gun or the equivalent, pointing at your self or your loved ones' would you write what you were told?

I agree that real effects have yet to be recognised by the corps-state captured, but I also sense that by the time this occurs the ratcheting of controls will already have delivered us to the next phase. I tend to agree with Austin-Fitts that the Plan cannot actually work to hold the conditions for life (the Tower of Babel syndrome), and so growing the seed for the opportunity ad the call to grow from a new place is a refinement to a true foundation from which to live - in the light of all we have lived. The 'How' of it all is at another level. I don't see we have to know how and then apply it, but truly desire to know and be in the way that  aligns in the act and unfolding of its fulfilment. That is to say relational presence rather than systemic strategies that recycle past trauma patterns in 'novel' forms.