The Miracle of Communication and the Mask of Control

 My comment arising from conversations on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhDRNx-9LRY

(On this episode of Unsafe Space 'Deprogrammed', Keri and Carter are joined by Konstantin Kisin)

Weaponised language works a corruption of language as a communication medium.

That's the nub of how to lose communication of being for a world of conflicting and seemingly warring 'meanings'.

The use of the term 'control' for 'power'. Is a usurping of what power truly is.

The truth of the power of love and life, is resting in the power of peace.

Truing up, releases inner conflicts to a more aligned purpose of heart and mind as one.

But in the context of 'rest in power' given in the conversation, it reveals a death cult.

This may seem 'hyperbole' but as a mind-capture, they know not what they do - from the perspective of love - not judgement.

I have lived with A Course in Miracles through a lot of life experience and it (along with much else) speaks directly to the root of the thinking-reversal that passes off as power and protection that in practice disempowers and delivers unto 'evils'. The basis for unity is not under any form of 'All the king’s horses and all the king’s men' or predicated in brokenness, grievance of loss and the drive to regain love and power by possession and control or indeed vengeance. The Christian act or witness (as opposed to 'Christian' by association or presentation) is open to the extension of love that unifies and heals, to release the mind from its conditioning to a world that covers over unhealed trauma or wound and grievance, as a narrative distribution of 'powers', values, and meanings as a leveraging of coercion and deceit that is in large sense invisibly internalised identity structure set as always shifting 'power struggle' or as is revealing itself; a system of endless war/sickness/guilt/fear on which such system feeds.

Noticing the dis-integrity of our thought and emotional response and actions, choosing not to persist or react from that basis and releasing identity investment of reaction, opens the space to asking a question - which is as Konstantin says, rooted in the intuition that an answer is possible - even though we don't know how. This describes a free willing self responsibility as distinct from a witch-hunt set in guilt, fear and coercion. the ego will always seek to pre-empt or subvert insight as a self-protective defence. But self-responsibility is within Life - and not within ideological or spiritual narrative identity dictates. Life will identify us truly as we extend, reflect, exchange and share it. We are 'trained' to fear this and to 'control it'.

A Course in Miracles attracted readers who in large part focus on 'spiritual' insight - of which there is in my view great depth. But it depicts the revealing of the 'ego' devices and deceits in terms that to use Carter's term, may seem hyperbole or for an overdramatic foil. But now I see this revealing of 'separation trauma' or existential fear, is rising into awareness in our world such as shift the balance of fear. Because the mask has to offer a significant sense of protection from fear as the alternative to looking at it - which is where self responsibility awakens. Without that differentiation the bubble will disintegrate from within. Look at the narratives in play - they make no sense except as the offer to 'lockdown in a wilful unconsciousness' as 'answer' to insecurity that is innate to life in the world and thus painted in demonic terms given repetitive reinforcement from a 'demonically possessed?' top down dictate. (Fear-driven).

One of the things I notice with opening to love in relational honesty is becoming a conduit for more to transform, forgive or release in myself (that I see in others) - in other words there is a relationship with growing awareness as joy - and inability to tolerate deeper dis-integrities of which I was once oblivious to.

Holding open the conditions for life to live and be and share Itself involves 'conscious responsibility' that allows a true freedom to know and share being.

I see this as the inner alignment to a true cultural renewal. The movement within our hearts is 'under the radar', and yet it is from true desire or questioning that answers become in us or come to us as a growing of a consciousness within and without that is also not of 'fear and control' but of resonant alignment of active decision.

I see our true command of being as free willing alignment, (love) but our common experience of loss of such support, guidance and direction is driven to seek control and possession externally as a masking substitution that can not love, heal, fulfil or satisfy, yet persists in maintaining allegiance as the lesser evil or the necessary evil.

Those who cannot abide an inauthentic life or chronic self-betrayal, have less willingness or capacity to hide from themselves.

The principle means to hide our hate is to accuse it in others, point the finger and throw the stone.

But in lesser forms can be in such moments as:

"now see what you made me do!".

If we WANT to give power of responsibility away when it suits us, we need recognise we gave it away when it comes back with interest.

#2

I recognise the sentiment but i prefer to hold FOR a tangible quality of life in what I might call biodiversity. Contrary to pathogenic projections the living Biome is at root symbiotic and therefore at root, so are we at the underlying level of intelligence. What we take to be intelligence is operating in large part from or through a filter of disconnect and dissociation that we call 'thinking' but which can spin a masking reality and become trapped in its own thought. As this is experienced as extremely distressing, it sets extreme reactions that can be extremely suppressed only to sprout a multitude of heads.

I notice the elites using the training of phrasing the response to pushback as as 'making an offer'.

I say thanks - but no thanks within a counter offer.

I can find verification of this (yet) but was told by a Christian speaker once that in Roman times there was a strict code for striking an inferior that involved the back of a specified hand (R or L) and that changing stance to show the other cheek was to present as an equal - ie to invite the other hand.

whether this is so - it illuminates my intuition of meeting another in equality of being - regardless of rank or status.

Not a doormat of passivity, but an I am - of extended recognition.

That obliges them to have to act in the context of life - and doesn't present the victim.

All those you transgress have a claim within you as a debt that cannot be escaped without seeking and finding reconciliation and release.