Invested illusions masking over truth

 https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/12/04/latest-news-213/#comments

I start with reference to France, Raoul and HCQ etc

HCQ protocols address a zinc deficiency not a novel and unique virus caused disease, but for anyone who believes that THEY hold an effective CURE that is being DENIED by vested interests is a prime time candidate for worshipping the disease that sets them in such a role by dramatic contrast.

Active Vit D can also be given such merit - along with various other protocols. There are some in the nutrition world who see 'covid' as the opportunity to bring nutritive approaches to public recognition and therefore invest in the 'One virus to rule them all' narrative.

But underlying understanding of toxicity and deficiency that accumulate to become what we call weakened 'immune system' or susceptibility to 'catch' or develop disease, points to symptoms as the body's defence in action and not as the disease itself.

The importance of naming or defining as a narrative framework through which findings, perceptions and data are then framed and fitted into cannot be overestimated.

To a narrative manipulation - Everything is a 'social construct' and thus a leverage for agenda framed and fitted to personal or private (masked) agenda. It is quite possible to mask our own 'conspirational support' for a lie - as this posts starts out showing, For each sees only what they want to see from an unconscious bias that operates as perceived self interest, resulting from acquired conditioning and learned adaptation.

If everything WERE - for the sake of argument - a social construct, then I suggest we are no longer talking of Reality representing or reflecting truth, but of mapping and modelling of a mind or mental construct through which we engage in the human world of meanings, overlaid upon a matrix of support for the experience of such a co-creation.

That this underlying whole is un-definable is implicit in science as a model, that never can become the reality itself - but is nonetheless invested and identifed in as IF it is Reality Itself, leading to competing definitions and narrative identities set in 'power struggle' for WHO gets to tell reality what it is. Or at least run as the gatekeeper and kingmaker of funded and supported perceptions.

Truth does not change. Nor is truth static.

Because there is none IN the construct - but only as resonant alignment of a true relation.

Neither pyschopathogen nor holy cure is IN the construct of the world, but through a true relational alignment are the balance points regained that constitute a true governance.

While each identity operates a polarised insistence from a presumption of moral necessity, the whole is actively denied a true voice or witness.

The breakdown of communication is the direct result of the attempt to weaponise and leverage thought and word and its results, to support an identifiction that can be summarised as :

"I Want It Thus!"

In a 3 year old a tantrum may seek monopoly, but lack the means to effect it.

That we mostly learn different strategies does not in itself mean we truly recognise the rights,needs and life of others.

A psychopathy learns to mask in social constructs as the way to get its separate needs through the realm of social manipulations and will have no other experience until the mask itself breaks down. To most of us, the investment in social reality is a primary determiner of our thinking, and so when there is a shift in social masking 'normals' thinking cannot find any basis from which to have any power - because there is no alignment to truth. Only adaptation within a larger social construct of identity entanglement that herds under the perceived source of power and protection - externally. Truth is always an inner discernment - no less when in relation to any external communication or something masking as a communication that is really an offer or invitation set persuasively or framed to elicit a sympathetic response.

Feared truth frames the mind in the impossibility of true safety, and sets up the self contradictory doublethink of a mind that is actively in denial of what it is absolutely dependent on - even to live such experience of a mind-reversal.

While the results of self-denial generate evils or dissonant and conflicting results, its development is of a core function of self-differentiation for the purpose of having, living and sharing in experience of truth through the lens of a segregative differentiation.

In this sense what we will is our result, but through an invisibly structured sense of self-construct that is protected against exposure as from loss of all that it means to live.

A recognition of true needs serving a reprioritisation of identity in attention is the revealing of the wilfulness as a choice that may be better served by looking at the situation from another perspective, rather than forcing a 'choice' on another as if to strengthen or boost a defence against exposure to feared truth - hence as a survival or 'fight' response set over the masking self-evasion of a flight response.

Fear begets fear such as to segregate the flow or unfolding of being to a stutter of boom and bust. But fear expresses a conflict of polarised charge separations as a split identification. The balance point seems to be a zero-point that both polarities seek in perpetually mutual dis-equilibrium of the always changing.

If we want life truly, we want to align in true relationship - even if all our habit-training has been to take a private sense of possession and control as the only life there is - or was - because it always operates as a hindsight and foresight of dissociative thinking with a presentation masking over simple presence.