Conceptual masking of private agenda as public good

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-192825

I appreciate your willingness to engage in communication with authorities - or those entrusted with authority, as an expression of caring.

When I read - I generally go to what speaks to me as the underlying issues - which are not really isolatable to another or to a pathogen - but to a breakdown of communication. So when I write it is not necessarily engaging in the personal or even specific points raised, so much as themes that to my view lack awareness, acceptance and articulation, such as to leave us defined within a mask of conflict - that feeds on conflict that can paralyse as well as inflame - ie 'lockdown' and 'pushback'.

I felt to put my response on: (This page):

The selection of otherwise ordinary and unexceptional individuals to a group think-tank is for their willingness to comply with groupthink. 'Common Purpose' is one such basis for selection. They are effectively fronting proxies or a masking ruse for a manipulative intent, but who believe in the good they think they are serving, or have become invested in and dependent upon personal rewards.

This can be seen as part of a neo-marxist framing where a social political agenda is set as the frame to which everything else is fitted or cancelled. The 'convenient truth' is in fact the lie, and transparency to the fact is masked over and ruled out.

It can also be seen as the 'lording over' of a masked mind of fear and control, by which private agenda seeks a split off of separate self-specialness. This 'lord' is never seen but witnessed to in the embodiment of fear as control - and has a resonance with our reptilian 'fight or flight' response as core survival, that in the raw is blind in overriding all else, but set fear as grievance or vengeance and masks in seeming virtue or self justifications seeking social reinforcement.

If it were transparent it could not function as a mask or frame within which to run as a sense of private security and control. Transparency to being is whole, and transparency to observation and fact is to messengers of wholeness. But a private mind defines itself a a whole, and all else of whom it is a part of - as 'other'.

Loss of awareness of wholeness as our sanity, integrity, and basis for communication, is to pride and fear - or to self-inflations and fear of loss of face - or identity. This has long been known but its cultural transmission has been lost to a progressive modernity that set pride and fear into technological framework of a global reach right down to local and biological controls.

The split mind of denied and masked fear generates self-reinforcing experience that in time works its own undoing. 'Truth will 'out!' is a recognition that illusion is by definition temporary, and yet a true reset or realignment to What Is - and who we truly are, is not a shifting or shape-changing of one form of illusion to another - but is the natural or unforced result of willingness for transparency and acceptance of truth instead of masking opacity to protect a fronting out of manipulative agenda.

To seek for who is 'in control' of such a world is to seek for and see such a world.

We learn to see the 'emperor's clothes' as part of adapting to a social construct or frame of meanings to which the living truth is conformed or discarded for a dead letter society.

Fear demands control, and control demands fear. Both operate the denial of awareness as acceptance. The mask over fear is also the mask over loveless or malign intent. No one can force another to accept what they are unwilling or unready to know, but we can serve or create conditions in which choices are recognised beneath the framing in compulsive dictates, such that freedom to choose differently rises of itself - instead of being pushed or impacted under guilt and fear.