Replacing Germ Theory

 https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/08/25/covid-what-have-we-learned/#comment-175953

Well you could simply research rather than expect a comprehensive answer in a post online!

Allow that an already accepted theory is already running as the way you think and respond, so as to notice that we are not talking about whether clinical symptoms are real - but what the underlying narrative that best explains or accounts for them is - and therefore the best way to prevent and respond to such events.

Germ theory - as was called  - (but germ (seed) is not used so much medically now) - arose from studies of bacterial 'infections' or ferments. The discovery of airborne yeasts and other biota fitted the popular mind as a replacement for evil spirits , retributions, curses, humoral imbalances or miasmas, with a 'modern scientific rationale' of germs as the agency of sickness. While there is of course some component here, the other side of the story is the terrain. Try introducing yeast into distilled water to create a ferment. The terrain and the 'seed' are the expression of a whole.

Terrain can be called immunity or resilience or simply health. But deficiency or toxic exposure both generate imbalance, loss of function and re-routing of functions to seek to retain core functions while mitigating harm and seeking opportunities for rebalancing or restoring health.

There are many ways by which we can be poisoned in the natural world - but vastly more so in an industrial exploitation of our world which includes social conditions as well as substances that interact with our biology in novel ways as we have no prior evolutionary experience of them.

But substances such as lead, arsenic and mercury have known toxicological profiles and the use of toxins in herbicides and pesticides balances private profit - and the leverages that come with wealth - with disease in those who use it, eat it or are exposed to it.

Likewise the model of virology as an 'heroic' intervention and 'rational' attack on the 'microbiological pests and pathogens' uses biocidal methods that are extremely profitable to those in the business but which suppress and divert or redefine symptoms - that are themselves treated as the disease - rather than valid feedback of an active immune response to deficiency or toxic stress. And the collateral damage or further toxic results are interpreted as a development of the disease or a new disease. This amount to a basis on which to farm disease in human beings for profit under guise of protecting them. But may have developed as a cover story against facing consequences for grievous mistakes along with the wish to be-live the story and role of a saviour, assigned trust, funding, power and privilege.

Old John Rockefeller sold crude oil as a cancer cure and educated his sons in the ways of trickery and deceit. He settled into business with it rebranded as a constipation cure. The development of a pharma based monopoly was often called 'Rockefeller medicine'. Why listen to a scientist when you can buy the training and funding of 'science'? Without the virus as the greatly feared pathological cause, the model collapses. Therefore control of the virus is shifting to 'genetic control' and this Bio-Security State uses fear of virus as if it is THE cause of disease - disregarding and downplaying the terrain (health), so as to be able to manually manage disease symptoms and treatments as a social and pathological regulator. Old John R had his own private and personal homeopath.

Suppressing symptoms can avert death or damage. The complex of defences that the body generates so as to maintain the conditions for life run alongside unresolved stresses, toxic load and ongoing deficiency. All the attention is fed to the 'problem' none on the miracle that is life. Releasing a problem-centric identity is both a responsibility now - and a process over time. But only if we are willing. If the pay-off from the problem outweighs the sense of risk in releasing it, then the 'rational' mind will provide all the evidences needed to justify why the problem is too big to fail. Terrain theory includes the role of biota within an ongoing balance of organism and total environment at cellular, body and species, and biosphere level.

Note - this is not 'there is no virus' diatribe so much as what the term 'virus' is defined and determined to mean and is therefore used for as a currency of accepted meaning. Exactly how extracellular communications operate - and how dead cells are broken down and recycled around the whole body according to signalled needs is a living jigsaw of a wholeness in motion. The belief that we (or our scientifically fed corporates)  can micro-manage this is ignorance and arrogance given power to spanner the works. But even this has it roots back in the moment of a sudden self-consciousness to a sense of lack and chaos that 'demands' to be controlled or at least masked over with fig leaf thinking. I hold that we will arrive at our beginning place by whatever routes, perhaps to know it for the first time.