Themes to the breakdown of communication to an insanity given power

in response to

https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/01/covid-deaths-in-canada-a-questionable-statistic/#comment-198997

I wrote:

The US is a ‘show’ culture, the show is the ‘stand up’ personality where the medium blocks the message.

But every facet (of our world) offers the opportunity to recognise who you are NOT.

If you need to demonise another, is it because they represent something we have not released in our selves.

I look for relational honesty rather than ‘impactful or branded presentations.

Sharon replied: Did I demonize somebody?

Are you interested in exploring the theme or predisposed to taking everything personally? I offered no offence to your person.

Alex Jones attracts viewers on the basis of joining in 'justified hate' which serves the purpose of substituting for love's honesty and is a form of demonising or invalidating such as to claim virtue from victimhood. That there is factual information within propaganda seeking emotional investment (by reaction) is the weaving of truth into a frame of lies.

If you recognise the framing of a communication as an attempt to trick or coerce, then you are wise not to react to it at face value, but step back and decode its true content - which will be an alloy of a genuine communication framed in distortions of possession and control. However, the genuine communication may be entirely unconscious to one who knows not what he does - as the fact of existence within the realm of Communication. What meanings you give, will be what you receive and be-live.

So in general terms, do you mask in claim of virtue derived from focusing in the guilt, sins or unworthiness of another?

If people knew what they did, they would be unable to do it. That they experience a version of 'reality' that 'makes them do it' is the nature of tyrannous or fear-defined identity. That such an identity can set us in a role is evident, and we not only identify in role, but project our own motives and roles to others out of our own past experience - and act as if our imagination is their (or the world's) reality.

To check back to Source for reality testing is the unwillingness to run on false currency - because it is not truly CURRENT - and involves overlays of distortion and bias. Discerning what is truly present is both a giving and receiving. When they are in balance, we know no separation of inner and outer - and have that experience as one of being more than joined in a compensation or mitigation of pain and threat. Love embraces what is as a perspective of recognition, appreciation and gratitude. Nurtured grievance 'love's to hate and hates to love. Only you can truly choose to accept for yourself. But from that choice a world arises in reinforcement. If you demonise or invalidate yourself, you may cover over or downplay the act but only to see others in the same measure and by response, 'teach them' by compensations for withdrawal and withholding of appreciation, such as to socially mask in avoidance, blind spots and bubbles of diversion and displacement.

Again, I am writing to the themes underlying the larger breakdown of communication to insanity given power. Not specifically to your contribution which I appreciate for owning that something can pass off as real, before revealing itself as artifice.

But a true disillusionment does not seek another illusion to persist in as real. And so can be simply a shape shifting illusion in which the goodies and the baddies keep changing as the current reactivity to a world set in grievance. As if the world cares about our story - excepting at the personality level of allies and enemies to narrative identity, which is the realm of the manipulative mask - if we let fear lock us down in divisions, distancing and isolation as our life.

Ultimately or truly you cannot demonise another but that you hate yourself, and they need not accept what you offer them. Nor need they or you, accept your judgement upon your self as true.