Cock up or Conspiracy?

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick commented on The lockdown is NOT a way of beating this virus.
Stories emerge, evolve and change. I must admit the first reporting of this seemed… unlikely. I am not, never have been, a great conspiracy theory kind of a guy. I am more of believer in a cock-up, followed by a conspiracy to cover up the cock-up, kind of a guy.

'Cock up' may itself be used as a term of damage limitation and plausible deniability by which to cover up a blind wilfulness that was indifferent or in callous disregard of others.

It then operates a very limited sense of responsibility of mistaken incompetence - by which an active agenda is protected from being held to account - and persisted in.

This is one of the reasons to use sock puppet politicians and other fronts. They operate as crisis actors to implement policies and sell narratives to the people under provided scripts, under background protection for service rendered.

And so the illusion of a collective rational intentions imperfectly planned or failed in - hence always on the cusp of being properly implemented under some 'new idea', is maintained as a cover story to the machinations of GETTING characterised by predatory or parasitical behaviours. Only now this is the nature of the systems and institutions that were originally set up to protect against such forces or hold them in check.

To the adaptation of a bubble reality, the disclosure of an underbelly of loveless intent - or hateful agenda is both abhorrent and disturbing. Hence the mind recoils to seek and find  some way to not know or un-see what it cannot as yet accept. This sort of dissociation operates automatically as a self-preservation. It also gives up conscious presence for unconscious blind spots in and through which crime operates in the open.

The seeking of a normality in which we do not have to address our own fears is the joining in the demand and provision of narratives of evasion given heavy socially reinforcing investment.
This is the lockdown of the mind that isolates against knowing what is going on - excepting through shared code of indirect representations that effect the assigning of responsibility as guilt and its payment in exclusion and denial. This ancient archetype can be manipulated by the power to set the narrative to false flag the guilt or agency of harm to almost anyone or anything.
IE: the device of pointing accusation from loud and repetitive claim of being unfairly treated and etc.

The inability to face fears, and the recoil and dissociation into denial and lockstepped social identities, is directly resulting from lack of love. And the persistence of exposure to the hateful without the centring and support of love only renders a mind mad in terms of driven or compulsive negative identification. On the other hand, the covering over of the hated and feared operates a false positive as a captive identity to the use of positive masking to hide what lies beneath. This literally hollows out the capacity to truly share in love of life and renders an artificial evasion running scared of its own life but seeing its own fearful shadows everywhere and claiming virtue by identifying in their denial.


Insofar as 'cock-up' can be read as a Freudian slip - we all have the capacity to be taken in by infatuations, glamours and fantasies that we WANT to be real - and as a result give up reality for - but open some relational perspective as a result - but which we may hate to own and so seek to offset to others or circumstance in attempt to regroup our working narrative identity from an unsupporting experience that transforms us - because we cannot really go back to not having opened such experience and so must integrate it or suffer the strain of refusal to accept relational honesty of being.

My desire to open the nature of the error to awareness is not to damn us, but to join in a willingness to integrate an expanded conscious responsibility as a result of  choosing not to give power to reactive emotional compulsions - while holding compassion for that we feel strongly - even unbearably so. This is willingness to abide and listen for the movement of being that is naturally and spontaneously integrative - but which the mind can and does short-circuit to effect a  self-reinforcing negative loop from which it cannot of itself escape. Because the mind is not 'of itself' even in self-isolating and self-referencing conflicts that effectively lock down its own functional expression.