Mind-as-defence is more than able to manifest diversion to what is a deeper fear

in reply to

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=144755#respond 

Very good points to what otherwise could run as 'accepted currency'. Misinfo and disinfo is only a matter of intentions. The last point raises my point that the mind-as-defence is more than able to manifest diversion to what is a deeper fear, and lock into the diversion even if it is a disease condition. I write because I have an appreciation of the psych-physical nature of our existence and yet also see that 'cause' can be inducted as say guilt regarding parents unhappiness, so as to 'take on' what does not belong to them, and suffer the conflict of it as if an inner failing, or project what IS theirs but what they want to get rid of, hide in or hide from which of course will always come home regardless the technology applied to 'whack-a-mole!'.

So perhaps a stinging criticism, taken to heart, can be displaced to the 'appearance' and even hold the meaning "Look on what you have done to me!" as a diversion of a vicious self-hatred.

Speaking of emotional expression can seem irrational because at a rational level we learn to mask over and control such feeling-reaction - and are considered to have 'lost control, be shamed' and deemed socially incapable in transparency or naked 'vulnerability'.

How much of our rationalising justifications or explanations are in effect a form of psychic-emotional armouring? Social or peer investment in the defence is a large part of its service as defence and this applies also to the idea of vaccines as a small ongoing sacrifice to fear by which to hope to escape a much greater pain of loss. But even this basis is become absurd to the expansion and mandate of a global state vaccine subjection as a sort of compulsory religion to which reason itself must be sacrificed. But then that may be to arrive at our starting place and recognise that giving power to fear, and then seeking a counter power to offset or hide it, is to make psychic emotional 'antibodies' or negatively triggering associations as a mindset against reliving a fear and so also against revising or revisioning our mind and model or interpretation of own self and world. This is the resistance to change that mere appeal to reasoned argument cannot reach, because we cannot see in others, what we are not accepting of or open to in ourself. And so we only 'see' through the lens of our own currency of acceptance or indeed not really see as a result of judgemental withholding of rights and worth.

Whoever has the most freedom of awareness is in the position to extend a true communication which - whatever its content - is addressed to another's worth and not at or about them in ways that 'un-person' or smear, attack or deny - which to my view is a dump of our own conflict onto others - within negative associations that wall out, deny voice and set us into a subjection to suffering our 'stuff' as if the power of others to deny us - because our 'defences' put it there - where it cannot BE resolved. At some point it may become obvious that we suffer our defences and lock into them, rather than suffer (live) the original conflict as our need and active call to find true resolution, reintegration, reconciliation or healing.