in reply to
Just a note to the framing of the article.
I invite and suggest being vigilant against propagating the information in the framework of reference asserted as consensual (sic) climate science.
Our attempts to study weather, climate, and cosmological context are ALL in infancy and predominantly expressing the accepted MODEL - as in filling in the gaps rather than challenging belief or dogma masking as fact.
Part of this 'false inheritance' is to stand on the shoulders of giant MISTAKES or 'wrong turnings' that become so fundamental to all invested identity of resource and reputation as to become 'ossified' or effectively put beyond question or officially supported or allowed discussion.You know where the 'power' is by what we are not able to openly discuss or speak to without fear of penalty and exclusion. But this is in fact where fear gives power away TO - whether knowingly or in unconscious recognition of the structural nature of funding, career and security.
So while people recognise 'climate contrarian' they are also invited into a polarised framework of identifications - that works to divide and rule out genuine communication.
Now it may be that the 'ruling elites' believe there is no way to communicate to those who do not share their worldview and so PR and the psyop replace the idea of democratic accountability, and replace the voice of the individual with quantified systemic data or frameworks of value relative to the 'ideals' of control and possession of all means of control.
It can so easily be obvious that the USE of apparently scientific data models is political and manipulative - indeed coercive. As such it qualifies as a psyop in intent whatever the apparent content being flagged up for threat and alarm. To immediately react to the assertions is to miss the baited trap - becausehaving reacted, we have in effect suffered a stolen identity by being phished.
Insofar as I consider Earth's always changing climate, or the desecration and despoiling of our living environment, I see the MEANINGS we give to change effect the archetypes we then re-enact or recycle through the ages.
But the core issue that I remain vigilant against is that of deceit - through the vector of our own self-illusion. For when ancient or primitive fears are invoked, the response that is triggered is blind and blinding.
In exactly the same way the 'primitive brain' or sympathetic response operates the contraction and shut down or subordination of all but immediate physical pathways in fight or flight and it is as if this 'response' is running autonomously as a past that must never be revisited or revisioned - and so re-enacts its pattern of denial and projected hate and fear in attacking its OWN shadow in everything.
Our catastrophic past (not the narrative of millions of years of uniform gradualism) has 'structured our consciousness through which we perceive and experience a self and world and brother as estranged, other and unlike. the 'territory' of our 'under-current denials' is what our surface mind was invoked to rule out. And so I CANNOT talk to you there or reach you there because it is a ruling out or denial of direct relational communication.
However beneath the masking presentations of self and world is a living presence that is in a sense put on hold while dealing or dallying with the drama of a conflicted sense of self and world. I will meet you there because there is no 'where' else that true meeting or true 'with-ness' can arise or occur.
With the advent of a greater awareness comes the fear of invested illusion still clung to as true. That we are in some sense 'stuck' in negatively self reinforcing habit of belief, interpretation and response is simply evident, but every polarised faction 'sees' the problem in the 'other'.
The NEED is always to pause instead of emotionally react - ESPECIALLY in emergency. The asserting insistent insinuation that we MUST ACT NOW OR ELSE! is the manipulative intent to prevent reflection and communication, so that a reaction can be set off that is like a shaped charge. Such is the psyop or psychological weapon.
Once this has been seen in one field it can become a signature alert to all - EXCEPT where personal investment in our worldview insists in making an exceptionalism - a case where loveless and dishonest means serve an accepted and invested goal.
Our Choice is always between aligning in the embrace and extension of Life - or the alignment in evading or avoiding the fear and pain of loss of life. the forms this takes are legion, but they asll sacrifice a truly shared appreciation now, for a future that never comes, begotten of a past that never TRULY was AS WE INTERPRET NOW. For while conditions may occur, our response to them is the creation or generation of meanings.
'Inherited and acquired fears' map out a world of conflicted insanity management Inc.
A truly current or present appreciation is the gift of releasing allegiance and identity from old patterns that no longer serve or fit who we now recognise and accept ourselves to be.
Conflict management Inc has to induce and insinuate conflict within your mind to operate through you.
Thanks - but no thanks!
There is a Peace of unconflicted being to any who would pause and desist their mind-reactions enough to free the awareness of Noticing. When we notice our thought we are no longer running as a background app, and from perspective comes new choices. Here is where we need be vigilant against putting the new wine in the old bottle paradigm - else we are subverting the forms of our insight to serve and strengthen the mask. No blame in noticing. Self-honesty is a gift of our true Inherence. Why feed it as 'sacrifice' to a god of guilt?
The Aztec regarded their race as 'chosen' in terms of engaging war by which to gather and effect the sacrifices that forfended the end of the 'Sun' or Age. The same pattern takes different forms - both collectively and individually. True worth-ship is shared to the glory of the Source and Nature of our being. True with-ness is receptive to the truth under all conditions instead of spinning off into a conditional 'love' of possession that of course dispossesses us. But the nature of a true alignment is the release of obstacles and not the struggle to eradicate symptoms while persisting the cause.
The weather, the oceanic currents and indeed earthquake and vulcanism are all in essence the result of electrical charge and discharge flux. This is true atomically, as it is in our Solar system, and through the Galactic to the Universal - and in our biology - as in our consciousness. But a compartmentalised denial of consciousness operates as if separate parts can operate separate and conflicting realities. This can then be used as a tool of limitation and doing so persistently becomes identifying in the tool as the determiner or framework of perceived meanings.
Computer modelling variable inputs to arrive at the result that attains funding and reputational status is a no brainer - or rather requires looking for the support of the projected model. Quite apart from the theory of Greenhouse 'gases' as the driver of radiant energy. Perhaps nanoparticulates in our atmosphere might yet come to the rescue of the theory - so as to justify the political shift to an Internment of Things under global and granular energy controls? An end to war? At cost of an end to Consciousness and life. Devolving to an unconsciousness is not an answer to unresolved conflict - but if given devotion, can obliterate all responsibility so as to merely live in the scream that cannot even find a voice - and accept this as the Way Things Are.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. If your comment does not show - it is probably waiting moderation - which is when I notice the email notification!