Tuesday, 10 January 2017
Loveless systems given power
Could NATO Try to Divide Russia Up?
An article at the Daily Bell
- - -
I used this article's theme as a morning meditation. Some may find this opens or stirs perspectives that reactive thinking diverts from noticing.
Systems that seem to be powers. As if ideas manifest or operate through agencies of their own propagation and reinforcement. The ideas are hidden from the personal sense because the personal sense of power is the illusion that the system operates by which to sacrifice awareness of thought for the virtual reality experience running within it.
The substitution of an essentially private awareness for the Felt Quality of being is a thought reversal by which to assert and succumb to a mind apart from and against the Life of all. But in masking forms that seem justifiable or plausibly deniable.
Systems or idea of division and rule operate the breakdown of communication, and of capacity to function, resulting in depletion, scarcity, conflict, sickness and death.
The virtual mind embodies the thought that made it - and runs upon and within thought, as imposed order within structural incoherence.
The core pattern is always the same regardless the forms it takes ; sacrifice of relational freedom to systemic violence - that may be largely but never completely masked.
Bringing the foundational thought to awareness never comes from thinking or acting within its terms. What is it for? What purpose is it serving? When the active beliefs and definitions are thus revealed - the obvious result is the recognition of meaningful function... or of a meaningless lack of relevance and functionality - within a truly present sense of who and what I am and what resonates true to me.
The use of the Other to polarize AGAINST is a way of generating a charge by which to leverage outcomes - and this sort of physics has characterized humanity as the notion of coercive power upon what otherwise stands clear as living communication and relationship. Willingness to participate in communication and relationship arrives at outcomes from a true participance - that embody a felt quality of integrity. True dialogue is not a system, method, technique or asserted order and as such is the free relinquishment of loveless or indeed hateful and destructive systems of thought that effectively run in place of the life we are moved to embrace and share in - as a result of learning failures, misidentifications and fascination with the exploration of the idea of power at expense of Other - whose flip side is subjection under the power of the Other.
What goes around comes around. What you put out is what you get back.
If globalism is a victory in degradation, destruction and death, just for a very few to 'lord it' over the wasteland - then it must embody the desire to persist in the false sense of power regardless of pain. Adapting to tolerate pain is the splitting of consciousness so as 'escape' a fragment, at expense and denial of the whole - as now represented in unconscious or denied Other.
The principle of wholeness IS a true Individuality - but to have it - one has to give or extend it to others. The 'multi-polar world' makes sense amidst authentic communication - and communication is not confined to verbal-mental constructs of meanings. Without true participance, the forms of communication are used to mask a bi-polar division under the insanity of a uni-polar victory.
Polarities seen OUTSIDE and irreconcilable to each other, engage attention at expense of owning their experience WITHIN us. But the recognition of conflict within is painful and fearful until the desire to be free of it holds clear purpose in place of shifting evasions of 'narrative control'.
A desire for coherence of being is receptive to the creative - which is not merely reactive or responsive in current historical terms. One does not have to understand how life works to live it. But a fear of loss of life put the attempt to understand and control above the native recognition of participance. If the 'deceiver' tricks us out of our true inheritance, it is because on some level I employed such a mind to obfuscate my own dilemma - and its systemic effects have run as the subconsciously routine 'default' ever since.
Natural divisions are vibrational frequencies within a whole. A sense of disconnect from wholeness aligns in fear of powerlessness, further loss, and death - and MUST seek power in its own terms as the power to break or limit communication or consciousness in 'salvation of a private agenda' that can only seem to exist upon the death or denial of wholeness. But privacy is truly the gift of honouring another by non-interference in what is not my business - and not a power of exclusion to assert upon the whole - and then claim possession of.